2011Jiangsu Medical JournalRequires access

Application of ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein access and catheterization

Peng Le

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the outcomes of ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein access and catheterization.Methods Eighty surgical patients undergoing central venous catheter placement were randomly assigned to two groups of U(ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein access and catheterization,45 cases) and C(classical anatomic landmark technique,35 cases).The time spent for puncture,success rate and incidence of complications were compared between two groups.ResultsThe time spent for puncture was shorter in group U than that in group C[(180±150) s vs.(540±210) s](P0.05).The success rate was higher in group U than that in group C(93.3% vs.88.5%)(P0.05).No any complication was seen in group U.Subcutaneous hemotoma secondary to incidental arterial puncture occurred in four cases in group C.Conclusion The outcomes of ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein access and catheterization are better than the classical anatomic landmark technique.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the outcomes of ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein access and catheterization.Methods Eighty surgical patients undergoing central venous catheter placement were randomly assigned to two groups of U(ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein access and catheterization,45 cases) and C(classical anatomic landmark technique,35 cases).The time spent for puncture,success rate and incidence of complications were compared between two groups.ResultsThe time spent for puncture was shorter in group U than that in group C[(180±150) s vs.(540±210) s](P0.05).The success rate was higher in group U than that in group C(93.3% vs.88.5%)(P0.05).No any complication was seen in group U.Subcutaneous hemotoma secondary to incidental arterial puncture occurred in four cases in group C.Conclusion The outcomes of ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein access and catheterization are better than the classical anatomic landmark technique.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the outcomes of ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein access and catheterization.Methods Eighty surgical patients undergoing central venous catheter placement were randomly assigned to two groups of U(ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein access and catheterization,45 cases) and C(classical anatomic landmark technique,35 cases).The time spent for puncture,success rate and incidence of complications were compared between two groups.ResultsThe time spent for puncture was shorter in group U than that in group C[(180±150) s vs.(540±210) s](P0.05).The success rate was higher in group U than that in group C(93.3% vs.88.5%)(P0.05).No any complication was seen in group U.Subcutaneous hemotoma secondary to incidental arterial puncture occurred in four cases in group C.Conclusion The outcomes of ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein access and catheterization are better than the classical anatomic landmark technique.

Key concepts: Medicine, Internal jugular vein, Ultrasound, Surgery, Catheter, Anatomical landmark, Complication, Venous access

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Application of ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein access and catheterization — Research Paper | ScholarLens