2010PubMedRequires access

[Condylar position of post-orthodontic patients with class II malocclusion].

jia-hui Zhou, Ding Bai, Yan Jing, Yu Ye, Yan Mary He, Ke Zhang, Pei-Jia Duan

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the condylar position of post-orthodontic patients with class II malocclusion. METHODS: Forty four patients with class II malocclusion were recruited, among whom 22 were given orthodontic treatment and 22 without any treatment as controls. The condylar distractions between centric relation (CR) and centric occlusion (CO) were measured by an Panadent articulator with Measurement of Condylar Displacement (MCD). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in condylar position between the two groups. Most condylar distractions happened to the posterior-inferior direction and were clinically acceptable. The amount of distractions was not correlated with Class II elastics. CONCLUSION: There is no enough evidence to show that traditional orthodontic treatment impacts the condylar position in patients with Class II malocclusion. However, attention still needs to be paid to condylar position in order to achieve a functional occlusion.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To study the condylar position of post-orthodontic patients with class II malocclusion. METHODS: Forty four patients with class II malocclusion were recruited, among whom 22 were given orthodontic treatment and 22 without any treatment as controls. The condylar distractions between centric relation (CR) and centric occlusion (CO) were measured by an Panadent articulator with Measurement of Condylar Displacement (MCD). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in condylar position between the two groups. Most condylar distractions happened to the posterior-inferior direction and were clinically acceptable. The amount of distractions was not correlated with Class II elastics. CONCLUSION: There is no enough evidence to show that traditional orthodontic treatment impacts the condylar position in patients with Class II malocclusion. However, attention still needs to be paid to condylar position in order to achieve a functional occlusion.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the condylar position of post-orthodontic patients with class II malocclusion. METHODS: Forty four patients with class II malocclusion were recruited, among whom 22 were given orthodontic treatment and 22 without any treatment as controls. The condylar distractions between centric relation (CR) and centric occlusion (CO) were measured by an Panadent articulator with Measurement of Condylar Displacement (MCD). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in condylar position between the two groups. Most condylar distractions happened to the posterior-inferior direction and were clinically acceptable. The amount of distractions was not correlated with Class II elastics. CONCLUSION: There is no enough evidence to show that traditional orthodontic treatment impacts the condylar position in patients with Class II malocclusion. However, attention still needs to be paid to condylar position in order to achieve a functional occlusion.

Key concepts: Articulator, Condyle, Malocclusion, Centric relation, Occlusion, Medicine, Orthodontics, Dentistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Condylar position of post-orthodontic patients with class II malocclusion]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens