2013Guanli kexue xuebaoRequires access

Carbon tax,cap-and-trade or mixed policy:Which is better for carbon mitigation?

Shi Min-ju

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

This paper developed a China energy-economic-environmental policy model based on a dynamic CGE model,designed a carbon tax scenario,a cap-and-trade scenario and a policy mix scenario,and simulated the economic and mitigation effects under different scenarios. The results show that only carbon tax policy cannot realize the 2020 mitigation target. Only cap-and-trade will cause high mitigation costs and tremendous mitigation pressure to regulated sectors. Combination of cap-and-trade with a low carbon tax can realize the2020 mitigation target with modest mitigation costs and mitigation pressures for regulated sectors. Meanwhile,the dispersed emitter will also bear mitigation commitments at a certain extent. The results of this paper suggest a mixed policy combining cap-and-trade with a low carbon tax as the first choice for carbon mitigation policy in China.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper developed a China energy-economic-environmental policy model based on a dynamic CGE model,designed a carbon tax scenario,a cap-and-trade scenario and a policy mix scenario,and simulated the economic and mitigation effects under different scenarios. The results show that only carbon tax policy cannot realize the 2020 mitigation target. Only cap-and-trade will cause high mitigation costs and tremendous mitigation pressure to regulated sectors. Combination of cap-and-trade with a low carbon tax can realize the2020 mitigation target with modest mitigation costs and mitigation pressures for regulated sectors. Meanwhile,the dispersed emitter will also bear mitigation commitments at a certain extent. The results of this paper suggest a mixed policy combining cap-and-trade with a low carbon tax as the first choice for carbon mitigation policy in China.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper developed a China energy-economic-environmental policy model based on a dynamic CGE model,designed a carbon tax scenario,a cap-and-trade scenario and a policy mix scenario,and simulated the economic and mitigation effects under different scenarios. The results show that only carbon tax policy cannot realize the 2020 mitigation target. Only cap-and-trade will cause high mitigation costs and tremendous mitigation pressure to regulated sectors. Combination of cap-and-trade with a low carbon tax can realize the2020 mitigation target with modest mitigation costs and mitigation pressures for regulated sectors. Meanwhile,the dispersed emitter will also bear mitigation commitments at a certain extent. The results of this paper suggest a mixed policy combining cap-and-trade with a low carbon tax as the first choice for carbon mitigation policy in China.

Key concepts: Carbon tax, Computable general equilibrium, Climate change mitigation, Carbon fibers, Natural resource economics, Economics, China, Tax policy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Carbon tax,cap-and-trade or mixed policy:Which is better for carbon mitigation? — Research Paper | ScholarLens