2004Journal of medical imagingRequires access

Percutaneous treatment of liver abscesses:needle aspiration versus catheter drainage

Yang Jing-chu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To determine and compare the efficacy of sonographically guided percutaneous needle aspiration (NA) and percutaneous catheter drainage (CD) in the treatment of liver abscesses.Methods:At random, 30 patients with liver abscesses underwent either NA (n=15) or CD (n=15) along with appropriate antimicrobial therapy,aspiration was attempted only once in each patient not responding to the first aspiration. Patients were followed up to assess the outcome of the percutaneous treatment, length of hospital stay and development of any complications, sonography was performed every third day.Results:The successful rates of NA and CD were 66.67%,100% respectively. Among the successful treated patients, the average time for clinical improvement and the mean hospital stay were similar in the two treatment groups. Although the average time needed for a 50% reduction in the size of the abscess cavity was significantly (P0.05) greater in the aspiration group than in the catheter group (13days versus 6days), the average time taken for total resolution of abscess was the same in both groups. No major complications were encountered.Conclusion:CD is more effective than NA in the treatment of liver abscesses.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To determine and compare the efficacy of sonographically guided percutaneous needle aspiration (NA) and percutaneous catheter drainage (CD) in the treatment of liver abscesses.Methods:At random, 30 patients with liver abscesses underwent either NA (n=15) or CD (n=15) along with appropriate antimicrobial therapy,aspiration was attempted only once in each patient not responding to the first aspiration. Patients were followed up to assess the outcome of the percutaneous treatment, length of hospital stay and development of any complications, sonography was performed every third day.Results:The successful rates of NA and CD were 66.67%,100% respectively. Among the successful treated patients, the average time for clinical improvement and the mean hospital stay were similar in the two treatment groups. Although the average time needed for a 50% reduction in the size of the abscess cavity was significantly (P0.05) greater in the aspiration group than in the catheter group (13days versus 6days), the average time taken for total resolution of abscess was the same in both groups. No major complications were encountered.Conclusion:CD is more effective than NA in the treatment of liver abscesses.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To determine and compare the efficacy of sonographically guided percutaneous needle aspiration (NA) and percutaneous catheter drainage (CD) in the treatment of liver abscesses.Methods:At random, 30 patients with liver abscesses underwent either NA (n=15) or CD (n=15) along with appropriate antimicrobial therapy,aspiration was attempted only once in each patient not responding to the first aspiration. Patients were followed up to assess the outcome of the percutaneous treatment, length of hospital stay and development of any complications, sonography was performed every third day.Results:The successful rates of NA and CD were 66.67%,100% respectively. Among the successful treated patients, the average time for clinical improvement and the mean hospital stay were similar in the two treatment groups. Although the average time needed for a 50% reduction in the size of the abscess cavity was significantly (P0.05) greater in the aspiration group than in the catheter group (13days versus 6days), the average time taken for total resolution of abscess was the same in both groups. No major complications were encountered.Conclusion:CD is more effective than NA in the treatment of liver abscesses.

Key concepts: Medicine, Percutaneous, Surgery, Abscess, Catheter, Liver abscess, Radiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Percutaneous treatment of liver abscesses:needle aspiration versus catheter drainage — Research Paper | ScholarLens