2005Guoji yiyao weisheng daobaoRequires access

Otoacoustic Emissions in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit for Hearing Screening

Guo Jin-feng

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of distortion product otoacoustic emissions for hearingscreening in neonatal intensive care unit . Methods 116 infants (232 ears) were screened by DPOAE with GSI70Automatic OAE . The outcome of DPOAE screening was compared with that of auditory brainstem response(ABR)test . Results Of 116(232ears) newborns , the co-positivity and co-negativity of DPOAE and ABR were42.19%(27/64ears) and 93.45%(157/168. The false negativity and false positivity of DPOAE were57.81% (37 /64ears)and6.55%(11/168ears). Conclusion In NICU , DPOAE screening made a high false negativity that may lead thecentral hearing loss missed , while ABR test has an important significance in first hearing screening forinfants of NICU as a reliable method.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of distortion product otoacoustic emissions for hearingscreening in neonatal intensive care unit . Methods 116 infants (232 ears) were screened by DPOAE with GSI70Automatic OAE . The outcome of DPOAE screening was compared with that of auditory brainstem response(ABR)test . Results Of 116(232ears) newborns , the co-positivity and co-negativity of DPOAE and ABR were42.19%(27/64ears) and 93.45%(157/168. The false negativity and false positivity of DPOAE were57.81% (37 /64ears)and6.55%(11/168ears). Conclusion In NICU , DPOAE screening made a high false negativity that may lead thecentral hearing loss missed , while ABR test has an important significance in first hearing screening forinfants of NICU as a reliable method.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of distortion product otoacoustic emissions for hearingscreening in neonatal intensive care unit . Methods 116 infants (232 ears) were screened by DPOAE with GSI70Automatic OAE . The outcome of DPOAE screening was compared with that of auditory brainstem response(ABR)test . Results Of 116(232ears) newborns , the co-positivity and co-negativity of DPOAE and ABR were42.19%(27/64ears) and 93.45%(157/168. The false negativity and false positivity of DPOAE were57.81% (37 /64ears)and6.55%(11/168ears). Conclusion In NICU , DPOAE screening made a high false negativity that may lead thecentral hearing loss missed , while ABR test has an important significance in first hearing screening forinfants of NICU as a reliable method.

Key concepts: Audiology, Neonatal intensive care unit, Otoacoustic emission, Medicine, Auditory brainstem response, Negativity effect, Hearing loss, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Otoacoustic Emissions in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit for Hearing Screening — Research Paper | ScholarLens