2000•Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical RemediesRequires access

Comparison of pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of two kinds of glipizide tablets in healthy volunteers

Zhi Liang Jiang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

AIM: To compare the relative bioavailability and evaluate the bioequivalant of two glipizide tablets in healthy volunteers man (tablet A was made by Farmitalia Carloerba, tablet B was made by Hannan Willine Pharmaceutical LTD. of P.R. China). METHODS: The relative bioavailability test was carried out in eight healthy volunteers(male) by orally administration 10 mg of glipizide tablets (A or B) on random cross method. A reverse phase high pressurre liquid chromatography(HPLC) was used to determinate plasma glipizide. RESULTS: The HPLC method had a linear concentration range from 20-1000 μg·L -1 ( r =0.9995), the recoveries varied from 99.70%-106.34%, and RSD was 3.09%-6.83% within a day, 2.22%-4.13% out of days. The results of a relative bioavailability test between tablet A and B were that C max was (555± s 173)μg·L -1 and (552±86)μg·L -1 respectively, T max (1.1±0.2)h and (1.6±0.3)h, T 12 (4.6± 1.2 )h and (4.2±0.6)h, AUC 0-T (2876±468)μg·h·L -1 and (3104±582)μg·L -1 ·h -1 . C max , T 12 and AUC 0-T of two formulations had not significant differences( P 0.05). T max of two tablets had significant differences( P 0.01). It meant tablet A had a shorter peak trough time than tablet B. CONCLUSION: Two kinds of glipizide tablets were bioequivalent. Graduate (College of Pharmacy, Shanghai Medical University)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM: To compare the relative bioavailability and evaluate the bioequivalant of two glipizide tablets in healthy volunteers man (tablet A was made by Farmitalia Carloerba, tablet B was made by Hannan Willine Pharmaceutical LTD. of P.R. China). METHODS: The relative bioavailability test was carried out in eight healthy volunteers(male) by orally administration 10 mg of glipizide tablets (A or B) on random cross method. A reverse phase high pressurre liquid chromatography(HPLC) was used to determinate plasma glipizide. RESULTS: The HPLC method had a linear concentration range from 20-1000 μg·L -1 ( r =0.9995), the recoveries varied from 99.70%-106.34%, and RSD was 3.09%-6.83% within a day, 2.22%-4.13% out of days. The results of a relative bioavailability test between tablet A and B were that C max was (555± s 173)μg·L -1 and (552±86)μg·L -1 respectively, T max (1.1±0.2)h and (1.6±0.3)h, T 12 (4.6± 1.2 )h and (4.2±0.6)h, AUC 0-T (2876±468)μg·h·L -1 and (3104±582)μg·L -1 ·h -1 . C max , T 12 and AUC 0-T of two formulations had not significant differences( P 0.05). T max of two tablets had significant differences( P 0.01). It meant tablet A had a shorter peak trough time than tablet B. CONCLUSION: Two kinds of glipizide tablets were bioequivalent. Graduate (College of Pharmacy, Shanghai Medical University)

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM: To compare the relative bioavailability and evaluate the bioequivalant of two glipizide tablets in healthy volunteers man (tablet A was made by Farmitalia Carloerba, tablet B was made by Hannan Willine Pharmaceutical LTD. of P.R. China). METHODS: The relative bioavailability test was carried out in eight healthy volunteers(male) by orally administration 10 mg of glipizide tablets (A or B) on random cross method. A reverse phase high pressurre liquid chromatography(HPLC) was used to determinate plasma glipizide. RESULTS: The HPLC method had a linear concentration range from 20-1000 μg·L -1 ( r =0.9995), the recoveries varied from 99.70%-106.34%, and RSD was 3.09%-6.83% within a day, 2.22%-4.13% out of days. The results of a relative bioavailability test between tablet A and B were that C max was (555± s 173)μg·L -1 and (552±86)μg·L -1 respectively, T max (1.1±0.2)h and (1.6±0.3)h, T 12 (4.6± 1.2 )h and (4.2±0.6)h, AUC 0-T (2876±468)μg·h·L -1 and (3104±582)μg·L -1 ·h -1 . C max , T 12 and AUC 0-T of two formulations had not significant differences( P 0.05). T max of two tablets had significant differences( P 0.01). It meant tablet A had a shorter peak trough time than tablet B. CONCLUSION: Two kinds of glipizide tablets were bioequivalent. Graduate (College of Pharmacy, Shanghai Medical University)

Key concepts: Bioavailability, Bioequivalence, Glipizide, Pharmacokinetics, High-performance liquid chromatography, Pharmacology, Chromatography, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of two kinds of glipizide tablets in healthy volunteers — Research Paper | ScholarLens