Comparison of pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of two kinds of glipizide tablets in healthy volunteers
Zhi Liang Jiang
Abstract
Zhi Liang Jiang
Abstract
AIM: To compare the relative bioavailability and evaluate the bioequivalant of two glipizide tablets in healthy volunteers man (tablet A was made by Farmitalia Carloerba, tablet B was made by Hannan Willine Pharmaceutical LTD. of P.R. China). METHODS: The relative bioavailability test was carried out in eight healthy volunteers(male) by orally administration 10 mg of glipizide tablets (A or B) on random cross method. A reverse phase high pressurre liquid chromatography(HPLC) was used to determinate plasma glipizide. RESULTS: The HPLC method had a linear concentration range from 20-1000 μg·L -1 ( r =0.9995), the recoveries varied from 99.70%-106.34%, and RSD was 3.09%-6.83% within a day, 2.22%-4.13% out of days. The results of a relative bioavailability test between tablet A and B were that C max was (555± s 173)μg·L -1 and (552±86)μg·L -1 respectively, T max (1.1±0.2)h and (1.6±0.3)h, T 12 (4.6± 1.2 )h and (4.2±0.6)h, AUC 0-T (2876±468)μg·h·L -1 and (3104±582)μg·L -1 ·h -1 . C max , T 12 and AUC 0-T of two formulations had not significant differences( P 0.05). T max of two tablets had significant differences( P 0.01). It meant tablet A had a shorter peak trough time than tablet B. CONCLUSION: Two kinds of glipizide tablets were bioequivalent. Graduate (College of Pharmacy, Shanghai Medical University)
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
AIM: To compare the relative bioavailability and evaluate the bioequivalant of two glipizide tablets in healthy volunteers man (tablet A was made by Farmitalia Carloerba, tablet B was made by Hannan Willine Pharmaceutical LTD. of P.R. China). METHODS: The relative bioavailability test was carried out in eight healthy volunteers(male) by orally administration 10 mg of glipizide tablets (A or B) on random cross method. A reverse phase high pressurre liquid chromatography(HPLC) was used to determinate plasma glipizide. RESULTS: The HPLC method had a linear concentration range from 20-1000 μg·L -1 ( r =0.9995), the recoveries varied from 99.70%-106.34%, and RSD was 3.09%-6.83% within a day, 2.22%-4.13% out of days. The results of a relative bioavailability test between tablet A and B were that C max was (555± s 173)μg·L -1 and (552±86)μg·L -1 respectively, T max (1.1±0.2)h and (1.6±0.3)h, T 12 (4.6± 1.2 )h and (4.2±0.6)h, AUC 0-T (2876±468)μg·h·L -1 and (3104±582)μg·L -1 ·h -1 . C max , T 12 and AUC 0-T of two formulations had not significant differences( P 0.05). T max of two tablets had significant differences( P 0.01). It meant tablet A had a shorter peak trough time than tablet B. CONCLUSION: Two kinds of glipizide tablets were bioequivalent. Graduate (College of Pharmacy, Shanghai Medical University)
Key concepts: Bioavailability, Bioequivalence, Glipizide, Pharmacokinetics, High-performance liquid chromatography, Pharmacology, Chromatography, Chemistry