2014Yunnan xueshu tansuoRequires access

Defects and Improvement of the Couple's Common Debts Presumption Rule —— Based on the Perspective of Evidence Law

Liu Ying-min

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

From the perspective of evidence law,the fundamental reasons for the unsatisfying practice of the couple's common debts presumption rule are the following: exceptions to the presumption are too limited and effect of the presumption is too strong. Accordingly,in order to improve the current presumption,two actions should be done,i. e. increasing the number of exceptions to the presumption and alleviating the validity of the presumption. Consequently,a debt borrowed by one party should be deemed as an individual debt,provided that it was borrowed without a prior consent from the other party and was not used for their common life. What is more,the burden of proof applied to this scenario should be modified to the extent that the current presumption regarding mandatory requirement on shifting objective burden of proof be changed to a presumption regarding mandatory requirement on shifting subjective burden of proof.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

From the perspective of evidence law,the fundamental reasons for the unsatisfying practice of the couple's common debts presumption rule are the following: exceptions to the presumption are too limited and effect of the presumption is too strong. Accordingly,in order to improve the current presumption,two actions should be done,i. e. increasing the number of exceptions to the presumption and alleviating the validity of the presumption. Consequently,a debt borrowed by one party should be deemed as an individual debt,provided that it was borrowed without a prior consent from the other party and was not used for their common life. What is more,the burden of proof applied to this scenario should be modified to the extent that the current presumption regarding mandatory requirement on shifting objective burden of proof be changed to a presumption regarding mandatory requirement on shifting subjective burden of proof.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

From the perspective of evidence law,the fundamental reasons for the unsatisfying practice of the couple's common debts presumption rule are the following: exceptions to the presumption are too limited and effect of the presumption is too strong. Accordingly,in order to improve the current presumption,two actions should be done,i. e. increasing the number of exceptions to the presumption and alleviating the validity of the presumption. Consequently,a debt borrowed by one party should be deemed as an individual debt,provided that it was borrowed without a prior consent from the other party and was not used for their common life. What is more,the burden of proof applied to this scenario should be modified to the extent that the current presumption regarding mandatory requirement on shifting objective burden of proof be changed to a presumption regarding mandatory requirement on shifting subjective burden of proof.

Key concepts: Presumption, Perspective (graphical), Debt, Burden of proof, Law and economics, Economics, Law, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Defects and Improvement of the Couple's Common Debts Presumption Rule —— Based on the Perspective of Evidence Law — Research Paper | ScholarLens