Comparison and Selection between Biased Estimator and LS Estimator
Gui Qing
Abstract
Gui Qing
Abstract
The problem of selection between biased estimator and LS estimator in GaussMarkov model is studied by using the hypothesis testing approach. Firstly, the comparisons between the two most important biased estimators, ordinary ridge estimator and principal components estimator, and LS estimator are conducted by using the criterion of mean squared error; and the conditions to show the superiority of each of these two estimators over the LS estimator have been obtained. Then, the tests have been suggested to verify whether or not these conditions hold in given situations by using the statistical method. Finally, the computational results demonstrate that if the null hypothesis is accepted with a significance level, we have to believe the reasonability of biased estimator instead of LS estimator and we can think if we use the biased estimator it will improve LS estimator more effectively. On the contrary, if the null hypothesis is rejected, we will suspect the biased estimator's superiority. In this case, using the LS estimator is still a good way.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The problem of selection between biased estimator and LS estimator in GaussMarkov model is studied by using the hypothesis testing approach. Firstly, the comparisons between the two most important biased estimators, ordinary ridge estimator and principal components estimator, and LS estimator are conducted by using the criterion of mean squared error; and the conditions to show the superiority of each of these two estimators over the LS estimator have been obtained. Then, the tests have been suggested to verify whether or not these conditions hold in given situations by using the statistical method. Finally, the computational results demonstrate that if the null hypothesis is accepted with a significance level, we have to believe the reasonability of biased estimator instead of LS estimator and we can think if we use the biased estimator it will improve LS estimator more effectively. On the contrary, if the null hypothesis is rejected, we will suspect the biased estimator's superiority. In this case, using the LS estimator is still a good way.
Key concepts: Invariant estimator, Estimator, Minimum-variance unbiased estimator, Efficient estimator, Stein's unbiased risk estimate, Bias of an estimator, Consistent estimator, Trimmed estimator