2011•China Modern MedicineRequires access

Efficacy of the uterine artery infusion and embolization combined for curettage to cure cesarean scar pregnancy

Xie Shuru

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of uterine artery infusion and embolization combined for curettage to cure cesarean scar pregnancy. Methods: 40 patients were randomly divided into two groups taken uterine artery embolization combines uterine curettage (combination group, n=20) and gynaecologic surgery (surgery group, n=20) respectively. The operation time, blood loss, uterine retention rate, hospitalization days of two groups were recorded and compared. Results: After the operation, found significant difference between the combination group and surgical group in uterine retention rates [95%(19/20)and 40%(8/20), P0.05]. The significant differences were also observed in operative time [(38.0±11.2) min and (115.0±32.5) min, P0.05]. There was significant difference in average hospitalization days [(6.8±1.2) days and (15.6±1.9) days, P0.05] between two groups. Conclusion: In the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy, the uterine artery embolization combines uterine curettage therapy is superior to gynaecologic surgery for its shorter operative time, less blood loss,shorter time of hospitalization and better security,it also can significantly reduce the hysterectomy rate and the risk of loss of fertility.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of uterine artery infusion and embolization combined for curettage to cure cesarean scar pregnancy. Methods: 40 patients were randomly divided into two groups taken uterine artery embolization combines uterine curettage (combination group, n=20) and gynaecologic surgery (surgery group, n=20) respectively. The operation time, blood loss, uterine retention rate, hospitalization days of two groups were recorded and compared. Results: After the operation, found significant difference between the combination group and surgical group in uterine retention rates [95%(19/20)and 40%(8/20), P0.05]. The significant differences were also observed in operative time [(38.0±11.2) min and (115.0±32.5) min, P0.05]. There was significant difference in average hospitalization days [(6.8±1.2) days and (15.6±1.9) days, P0.05] between two groups. Conclusion: In the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy, the uterine artery embolization combines uterine curettage therapy is superior to gynaecologic surgery for its shorter operative time, less blood loss,shorter time of hospitalization and better security,it also can significantly reduce the hysterectomy rate and the risk of loss of fertility.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of uterine artery infusion and embolization combined for curettage to cure cesarean scar pregnancy. Methods: 40 patients were randomly divided into two groups taken uterine artery embolization combines uterine curettage (combination group, n=20) and gynaecologic surgery (surgery group, n=20) respectively. The operation time, blood loss, uterine retention rate, hospitalization days of two groups were recorded and compared. Results: After the operation, found significant difference between the combination group and surgical group in uterine retention rates [95%(19/20)and 40%(8/20), P0.05]. The significant differences were also observed in operative time [(38.0±11.2) min and (115.0±32.5) min, P0.05]. There was significant difference in average hospitalization days [(6.8±1.2) days and (15.6±1.9) days, P0.05] between two groups. Conclusion: In the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy, the uterine artery embolization combines uterine curettage therapy is superior to gynaecologic surgery for its shorter operative time, less blood loss,shorter time of hospitalization and better security,it also can significantly reduce the hysterectomy rate and the risk of loss of fertility.

Key concepts: Medicine, Curettage, Uterine artery embolization, Uterine artery, Blood loss, Surgery, Hysterectomy, Pregnancy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Efficacy of the uterine artery infusion and embolization combined for curettage to cure cesarean scar pregnancy — Research Paper | ScholarLens