The potential of RU 486 for medical termination of pregnancy :an acceptability and feasibility study
Sun Hong
Abstract
Sun Hong
Abstract
iaoning Research Institute for Family Planning Objective:To compare the acceptability of medical abortion with mifepristone and that of surgical abor- tion.Design : A non-randomized comparative study of two treatment methods.Setting :A clinic in the National Research Institute for Family Planning Subjects: 168 women with gestational age of 42~56 days requesting termination were given the choice of medical abortion with RU 486 or vacuum aspiration.Intervention: For medical abortion RU486 600 mg was given on the day of admission and misoprostol 400 μg 48 hours later.Surgical abortionwas performed with vacuum aspiration.Results :A hundred women chose medical abortion,while 68 chose surgical abortion.The complete abortion rate with the medical and surgical abortion were 91%and 100%,respectively.The main reason for choosing medical abortion was less pain(75%),while those for choosing surgical abortion were high effec tiveness(41.2%)and short abortion time(57.4%).The main bad features for the medical method were prolonged bleeding(25%)and more blood loss( 11%).The mean duration of bleeding after abortion was 16.1±9.0 days,significantly longer than after the surgical abortion(8.9±6.1 days)。Conclusion :Medical abortion with RU 486 is more acceptable,the only drawback is the prolonged postabortion bleeding Further study to reduce bleeding after medical abortion is needed.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
iaoning Research Institute for Family Planning Objective:To compare the acceptability of medical abortion with mifepristone and that of surgical abor- tion.Design : A non-randomized comparative study of two treatment methods.Setting :A clinic in the National Research Institute for Family Planning Subjects: 168 women with gestational age of 42~56 days requesting termination were given the choice of medical abortion with RU 486 or vacuum aspiration.Intervention: For medical abortion RU486 600 mg was given on the day of admission and misoprostol 400 μg 48 hours later.Surgical abortionwas performed with vacuum aspiration.Results :A hundred women chose medical abortion,while 68 chose surgical abortion.The complete abortion rate with the medical and surgical abortion were 91%and 100%,respectively.The main reason for choosing medical abortion was less pain(75%),while those for choosing surgical abortion were high effec tiveness(41.2%)and short abortion time(57.4%).The main bad features for the medical method were prolonged bleeding(25%)and more blood loss( 11%).The mean duration of bleeding after abortion was 16.1±9.0 days,significantly longer than after the surgical abortion(8.9±6.1 days)。Conclusion :Medical abortion with RU 486 is more acceptable,the only drawback is the prolonged postabortion bleeding Further study to reduce bleeding after medical abortion is needed.
Key concepts: Medical abortion, Medicine, Vacuum aspiration, Misoprostol, Abortion, Mifepristone, Products of conception, Incomplete Abortion