2004Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical RemediesRequires access

Bioequivalence of two kinds of finasterides tablets in healthy volunteers

Sun Jian

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

AIM: To study the phamacokinetic and relative bioavailability and evaluate the bioequivalence of two kinds of finestarid tablets. METHODS: A random crossover trial was designed. Plasma concentrations were determined by HPLC method following a single oral dose 40 mg two different brand finasteride preparations. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic parameters of the test tablets and the reference tablets in plasma were as following: AUC_ 0-24 were(1597±s 610) μg·h·L -1 and (1569±629) μg·h·L -1,AUC_ 0-∞ were(1680±607) μg·h·L -1 and(1675±628)μg·h·L -1,T_ max were( 2.4 ±0.3) h and( 2.3± 0.3) h,C_ max were (280±112) μg·L -1 and (284±110) μg·L -1, T_ 1/2 were( 2.9± 0.8) h and( 3.3± 1.0) h. When Proscar was reference preparation, the F_ 0-24 of finasteride was(103±18) %, and the F_ 0-∞ was(101±16) %. CONCLUSION: The two kinds of finasteride tablets are of bioequivalence.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM: To study the phamacokinetic and relative bioavailability and evaluate the bioequivalence of two kinds of finestarid tablets. METHODS: A random crossover trial was designed. Plasma concentrations were determined by HPLC method following a single oral dose 40 mg two different brand finasteride preparations. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic parameters of the test tablets and the reference tablets in plasma were as following: AUC_ 0-24 were(1597±s 610) μg·h·L -1 and (1569±629) μg·h·L -1,AUC_ 0-∞ were(1680±607) μg·h·L -1 and(1675±628)μg·h·L -1,T_ max were( 2.4 ±0.3) h and( 2.3± 0.3) h,C_ max were (280±112) μg·L -1 and (284±110) μg·L -1, T_ 1/2 were( 2.9± 0.8) h and( 3.3± 1.0) h. When Proscar was reference preparation, the F_ 0-24 of finasteride was(103±18) %, and the F_ 0-∞ was(101±16) %. CONCLUSION: The two kinds of finasteride tablets are of bioequivalence.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM: To study the phamacokinetic and relative bioavailability and evaluate the bioequivalence of two kinds of finestarid tablets. METHODS: A random crossover trial was designed. Plasma concentrations were determined by HPLC method following a single oral dose 40 mg two different brand finasteride preparations. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic parameters of the test tablets and the reference tablets in plasma were as following: AUC_ 0-24 were(1597±s 610) μg·h·L -1 and (1569±629) μg·h·L -1,AUC_ 0-∞ were(1680±607) μg·h·L -1 and(1675±628)μg·h·L -1,T_ max were( 2.4 ±0.3) h and( 2.3± 0.3) h,C_ max were (280±112) μg·L -1 and (284±110) μg·L -1, T_ 1/2 were( 2.9± 0.8) h and( 3.3± 1.0) h. When Proscar was reference preparation, the F_ 0-24 of finasteride was(103±18) %, and the F_ 0-∞ was(101±16) %. CONCLUSION: The two kinds of finasteride tablets are of bioequivalence.

Key concepts: Bioequivalence, Bioavailability, Pharmacokinetics, Finasteride, Crossover study, Plasma concentration, Pharmacology, Chromatography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bioequivalence of two kinds of finasterides tablets in healthy volunteers — Research Paper | ScholarLens