2010•Anhui nongye kexueRequires access

Research on Discrimination of Ancient Agricultural Books in China

Lingjie Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

According to the evolutionary path of distinguishing truth from falsity for ancient books in China,the arguments and authenticity of facts of the ancient agricultural books recorded in Summary of General Catalogue of Imperial Collection of Four were studied,so as to provide a reference for the future research of ancient agricultural books.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

According to the evolutionary path of distinguishing truth from falsity for ancient books in China,the arguments and authenticity of facts of the ancient agricultural books recorded in Summary of General Catalogue of Imperial Collection of Four were studied,so as to provide a reference for the future research of ancient agricultural books.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

According to the evolutionary path of distinguishing truth from falsity for ancient books in China,the arguments and authenticity of facts of the ancient agricultural books recorded in Summary of General Catalogue of Imperial Collection of Four were studied,so as to provide a reference for the future research of ancient agricultural books.

Key concepts: Falsity, Agriculture, China, History of China, Path (computing), Classics, History, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Research on Discrimination of Ancient Agricultural Books in China — Research Paper | ScholarLens