Transcendental Arguments and Skepticism
XU Xiang-dong
Abstract
XU Xiang-dong
Abstract
Philosophers, since Kant, frequently use the transcendental arguments in response to skeptical challenges. They use the arguments also in different fields of contemporary analytical philosophy. XU Xiang-dong, by means of revealing and clarifying the very nature of the transcendental arguments, tries to show that transcendental arguments have failed in fully addressing skeptical challenges. The arguments, nevertheless, make a significant contribution to our understanding of the nature and limits of human knowledge.
OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Philosophers, since Kant, frequently use the transcendental arguments in response to skeptical challenges. They use the arguments also in different fields of contemporary analytical philosophy. XU Xiang-dong, by means of revealing and clarifying the very nature of the transcendental arguments, tries to show that transcendental arguments have failed in fully addressing skeptical challenges. The arguments, nevertheless, make a significant contribution to our understanding of the nature and limits of human knowledge.
Key concepts: Skepticism, Transcendental number, Transcendental philosophy, Epistemology, Philosophy, Transcendental idealism