2005•Journal of Hunan UniversityRequires access

Comparative Study of Dynamic Shear Modulus through Laboratory Experiments

Gang Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

AbstrcatThe results of soil dynamic analysis are different because of the difference of soil dynamic parameters. To get reliable soil dynamic characters of large-scale model tests of dynamic soil-foundation-structure interaction system, cyclic simple shear tests of undisturbed samples and dynamic triaxial tests of compact specimens were performed under 100 kPa,200 kPa and 300 kPa consolidation pressures, and the maximal dynamic shear modulus G_(dmax) and the curves of G/G_(dmax)-γ were obtained and analyzed comparatively. Results showed that the maximal dynamic shear modulus G_(dmax) obtained from cyclic simple shear tests was less than that from dynamic triaxial tests;and the dynamic shear modulus ratio G/G_(dmax) obtained from cyclic simple shear tests was more than that from dynamic triaxial tests under 100 kPa and 200 kPa consolidation pressures, but the G/G_(dmax) obtained from cyclic simple shear tests was less than that from dynamic triaxial tests under 300 kPa consolidation pressure.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AbstrcatThe results of soil dynamic analysis are different because of the difference of soil dynamic parameters. To get reliable soil dynamic characters of large-scale model tests of dynamic soil-foundation-structure interaction system, cyclic simple shear tests of undisturbed samples and dynamic triaxial tests of compact specimens were performed under 100 kPa,200 kPa and 300 kPa consolidation pressures, and the maximal dynamic shear modulus G_(dmax) and the curves of G/G_(dmax)-γ were obtained and analyzed comparatively. Results showed that the maximal dynamic shear modulus G_(dmax) obtained from cyclic simple shear tests was less than that from dynamic triaxial tests;and the dynamic shear modulus ratio G/G_(dmax) obtained from cyclic simple shear tests was more than that from dynamic triaxial tests under 100 kPa and 200 kPa consolidation pressures, but the G/G_(dmax) obtained from cyclic simple shear tests was less than that from dynamic triaxial tests under 300 kPa consolidation pressure.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AbstrcatThe results of soil dynamic analysis are different because of the difference of soil dynamic parameters. To get reliable soil dynamic characters of large-scale model tests of dynamic soil-foundation-structure interaction system, cyclic simple shear tests of undisturbed samples and dynamic triaxial tests of compact specimens were performed under 100 kPa,200 kPa and 300 kPa consolidation pressures, and the maximal dynamic shear modulus G_(dmax) and the curves of G/G_(dmax)-γ were obtained and analyzed comparatively. Results showed that the maximal dynamic shear modulus G_(dmax) obtained from cyclic simple shear tests was less than that from dynamic triaxial tests;and the dynamic shear modulus ratio G/G_(dmax) obtained from cyclic simple shear tests was more than that from dynamic triaxial tests under 100 kPa and 200 kPa consolidation pressures, but the G/G_(dmax) obtained from cyclic simple shear tests was less than that from dynamic triaxial tests under 300 kPa consolidation pressure.

Key concepts: Shear modulus, Consolidation (business), Dynamic modulus, Materials science, Shear (geology), Triaxial shear test, Geotechnical engineering, Simple shear

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative Study of Dynamic Shear Modulus through Laboratory Experiments — Research Paper | ScholarLens