2010Zhongguo xinli weisheng zazhiRequires access

Efficacy and safety of escitalopram in elderly patients with major depression:A randomized and control study

Jian Guo

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of escitalopram in elderly patients with major depression.Method:This was an 8 weeks,randomized control and open-label study.Totally 107 elderly patients were randomly assigned to escitalopram group(n=52)or paroxetin group(n=55).The efficacy was evaluated with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression(HRSD)and Geriatric Depression Scale(GDS).The Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale(TESS)was used to evaluate the side effects caused by the antidepressants.Intent to Treat Analysis(ITT)was used to process study data,and Last Observation Carried Forward(LOCF)was adopted to deal with missing value caused by withdrawing patients during 8-week observation.Results:The 8-week drop rate in escitalopram group was lower than that in paroxetine group(21% vs.40.0%,P=0.034).In patients who completed 8-week trial,the difference of symptom improvement rate between escitalopram group and paroxetine group was not statistically significant(P0.05).ITT analysis showed that at the end of 8-week observation,there was no statistically difference in efficacy between the two groups.But escitalopram group showed earlier improvement in depressive symptoms than paroxetine group(e.g.GDS score at the end of the 1st week,(13.7±4.5)vs.(17.3±5.1),P0.001;HRSD score at the end of the 2nd week,(16.6±3.5)vs.(24.4±6.1),P0.001),and lower rate of adverse reactions than paroxetine group(28.8% vs.47.3%,P0.05).Conclusion:Escitalopram in the treatment of depression in elderly patients may have better efficacy and tolerance than paroxetine.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of escitalopram in elderly patients with major depression.Method:This was an 8 weeks,randomized control and open-label study.Totally 107 elderly patients were randomly assigned to escitalopram group(n=52)or paroxetin group(n=55).The efficacy was evaluated with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression(HRSD)and Geriatric Depression Scale(GDS).The Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale(TESS)was used to evaluate the side effects caused by the antidepressants.Intent to Treat Analysis(ITT)was used to process study data,and Last Observation Carried Forward(LOCF)was adopted to deal with missing value caused by withdrawing patients during 8-week observation.Results:The 8-week drop rate in escitalopram group was lower than that in paroxetine group(21% vs.40.0%,P=0.034).In patients who completed 8-week trial,the difference of symptom improvement rate between escitalopram group and paroxetine group was not statistically significant(P0.05).ITT analysis showed that at the end of 8-week observation,there was no statistically difference in efficacy between the two groups.But escitalopram group showed earlier improvement in depressive symptoms than paroxetine group(e.g.GDS score at the end of the 1st week,(13.7±4.5)vs.(17.3±5.1),P0.001;HRSD score at the end of the 2nd week,(16.6±3.5)vs.(24.4±6.1),P0.001),and lower rate of adverse reactions than paroxetine group(28.8% vs.47.3%,P0.05).Conclusion:Escitalopram in the treatment of depression in elderly patients may have better efficacy and tolerance than paroxetine.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of escitalopram in elderly patients with major depression.Method:This was an 8 weeks,randomized control and open-label study.Totally 107 elderly patients were randomly assigned to escitalopram group(n=52)or paroxetin group(n=55).The efficacy was evaluated with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression(HRSD)and Geriatric Depression Scale(GDS).The Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale(TESS)was used to evaluate the side effects caused by the antidepressants.Intent to Treat Analysis(ITT)was used to process study data,and Last Observation Carried Forward(LOCF)was adopted to deal with missing value caused by withdrawing patients during 8-week observation.Results:The 8-week drop rate in escitalopram group was lower than that in paroxetine group(21% vs.40.0%,P=0.034).In patients who completed 8-week trial,the difference of symptom improvement rate between escitalopram group and paroxetine group was not statistically significant(P0.05).ITT analysis showed that at the end of 8-week observation,there was no statistically difference in efficacy between the two groups.But escitalopram group showed earlier improvement in depressive symptoms than paroxetine group(e.g.GDS score at the end of the 1st week,(13.7±4.5)vs.(17.3±5.1),P0.001;HRSD score at the end of the 2nd week,(16.6±3.5)vs.(24.4±6.1),P0.001),and lower rate of adverse reactions than paroxetine group(28.8% vs.47.3%,P0.05).Conclusion:Escitalopram in the treatment of depression in elderly patients may have better efficacy and tolerance than paroxetine.

Key concepts: Escitalopram, Paroxetine, Depression (economics), Psychology, Rating scale, Internal medicine, Randomized controlled trial, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Efficacy and safety of escitalopram in elderly patients with major depression:A randomized and control study — Research Paper | ScholarLens