On the Unjustness of Pre-Definitely Facts in Decisions as Facts with Need not to be Proved in Civil Litigation
Keqin Wang
Abstract
Keqin Wang
Abstract
Res Judicata,which is the basic of pre-definitely facts in decisions as facts with need not to be proved in civil litigation,has not been established completely in our country.And surveying from the visual angle of res judicata,the active laws and the behaviors done during the judicial practice in our country are improper.So it is unwarrantable for pre-definitely facts in decisions to be facts with need not to be proved in civil litigation.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Res Judicata,which is the basic of pre-definitely facts in decisions as facts with need not to be proved in civil litigation,has not been established completely in our country.And surveying from the visual angle of res judicata,the active laws and the behaviors done during the judicial practice in our country are improper.So it is unwarrantable for pre-definitely facts in decisions to be facts with need not to be proved in civil litigation.
Key concepts: Res judicata, Civil procedure, Civil litigation, Political science, Law, Law and economics, Sociology