2006Journal of Tianjin University of CommerceRequires access

“Cambridge Capital Argument”:Retrospect and Prospect

Lin Tie-zheng

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

“Cambridge capital argument”illustrates some logic paradoxes of Neo-classic economics with the concepts of“Capital Measurement”,“Reswitching of Technique”and“Reverse Capital”,caused by the wrongly commingling of Keynes' economics and the value and distribution theory of neo-classical economics,neglecting the special competitive re- lation of the capitalism.In contrast,Marx's economics deeply studied economic relations among the total variables on the base of social relations.The only solution to this argument is to introduce the classical general equilibrium of social rela- tion.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

“Cambridge capital argument”illustrates some logic paradoxes of Neo-classic economics with the concepts of“Capital Measurement”,“Reswitching of Technique”and“Reverse Capital”,caused by the wrongly commingling of Keynes' economics and the value and distribution theory of neo-classical economics,neglecting the special competitive re- lation of the capitalism.In contrast,Marx's economics deeply studied economic relations among the total variables on the base of social relations.The only solution to this argument is to introduce the classical general equilibrium of social rela- tion.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

“Cambridge capital argument”illustrates some logic paradoxes of Neo-classic economics with the concepts of“Capital Measurement”,“Reswitching of Technique”and“Reverse Capital”,caused by the wrongly commingling of Keynes' economics and the value and distribution theory of neo-classical economics,neglecting the special competitive re- lation of the capitalism.In contrast,Marx's economics deeply studied economic relations among the total variables on the base of social relations.The only solution to this argument is to introduce the classical general equilibrium of social rela- tion.

Key concepts: Argument (complex analysis), Neoclassical economics, Capitalism, Economics, Positive economics, Capital (architecture), Value (mathematics), Social capital

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
“Cambridge Capital Argument”:Retrospect and Prospect — Research Paper | ScholarLens