2007Nanjing Linye Daxue xuebaoRequires access

“Human” in “Nature Dialectics”:the Human Ontology of Ecological Ethics

Sun Dao-jin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In Nature Dialectics,Enges made scientific and dialectic interpretation of nature from the perspective of nature and history.From the perspective of nature,human is the existence of protein,sharing the same features with non-human beings,and that is the superficial meaning of human.Ethics,therefore,should go beyond the focused attention to beings and expand the limit of community,involving nature in it.From the perspective of history,human is the product of labor,and the self-production of human′s activities of recognizing and changing the world.That is the deeper meaning of human.The fact that labor involves objects decides the interdependent relationship between and nature,which makes view nature as moral client inevitably in logic.In this way,Enges interpretation of nature goes beyond not only the natural human of non-anthropocentrism,but also the rational human of anthropocentrism,which provides ecological ethics with sufficient ontological ground.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In Nature Dialectics,Enges made scientific and dialectic interpretation of nature from the perspective of nature and history.From the perspective of nature,human is the existence of protein,sharing the same features with non-human beings,and that is the superficial meaning of human.Ethics,therefore,should go beyond the focused attention to beings and expand the limit of community,involving nature in it.From the perspective of history,human is the product of labor,and the self-production of human′s activities of recognizing and changing the world.That is the deeper meaning of human.The fact that labor involves objects decides the interdependent relationship between and nature,which makes view nature as moral client inevitably in logic.In this way,Enges interpretation of nature goes beyond not only the natural human of non-anthropocentrism,but also the rational human of anthropocentrism,which provides ecological ethics with sufficient ontological ground.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In Nature Dialectics,Enges made scientific and dialectic interpretation of nature from the perspective of nature and history.From the perspective of nature,human is the existence of protein,sharing the same features with non-human beings,and that is the superficial meaning of human.Ethics,therefore,should go beyond the focused attention to beings and expand the limit of community,involving nature in it.From the perspective of history,human is the product of labor,and the self-production of human′s activities of recognizing and changing the world.That is the deeper meaning of human.The fact that labor involves objects decides the interdependent relationship between and nature,which makes view nature as moral client inevitably in logic.In this way,Enges interpretation of nature goes beyond not only the natural human of non-anthropocentrism,but also the rational human of anthropocentrism,which provides ecological ethics with sufficient ontological ground.

Key concepts: Anthropocentrism, Dialectic, Epistemology, Meaning (existential), Interpretation (philosophy), Environmental ethics, Sociology, Perspective (graphical)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
“Human” in “Nature Dialectics”:the Human Ontology of Ecological Ethics — Research Paper | ScholarLens