2007Jiangsu Medical JournalRequires access

A comparison of standard large craniectomy with routine craniectomy in treatment of severe traumatic brain injuries

Chen Ju

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the outcomes of standard large craniectomy with routine craniectomy in 223 severe traumatic brain injured patients. Methods Two hundred and twenty-three patients were randomly divided into standard large craniectomy group (n=108) and routine craniectomy group (n=115).The traumatic brain injuries were all comfirmed by CT scan. Results The patients have been followed up for 6 months.The results showed that 38 cases in the standard large craniectomy group got favorable outcome(35.19%),and 29 cases in routine craniectomy group got favorable outcome(25.22%).Conclusion The rates of delayed hematomas, second operations, incisional hernia, and CSF rhinorrhea in standard large craniectomy group were lower than those in routine craniectomy. Standard large craniectomy could be applied in the patients with severe contusion and laceration of brain and intracranial hypertension.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the outcomes of standard large craniectomy with routine craniectomy in 223 severe traumatic brain injured patients. Methods Two hundred and twenty-three patients were randomly divided into standard large craniectomy group (n=108) and routine craniectomy group (n=115).The traumatic brain injuries were all comfirmed by CT scan. Results The patients have been followed up for 6 months.The results showed that 38 cases in the standard large craniectomy group got favorable outcome(35.19%),and 29 cases in routine craniectomy group got favorable outcome(25.22%).Conclusion The rates of delayed hematomas, second operations, incisional hernia, and CSF rhinorrhea in standard large craniectomy group were lower than those in routine craniectomy. Standard large craniectomy could be applied in the patients with severe contusion and laceration of brain and intracranial hypertension.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the outcomes of standard large craniectomy with routine craniectomy in 223 severe traumatic brain injured patients. Methods Two hundred and twenty-three patients were randomly divided into standard large craniectomy group (n=108) and routine craniectomy group (n=115).The traumatic brain injuries were all comfirmed by CT scan. Results The patients have been followed up for 6 months.The results showed that 38 cases in the standard large craniectomy group got favorable outcome(35.19%),and 29 cases in routine craniectomy group got favorable outcome(25.22%).Conclusion The rates of delayed hematomas, second operations, incisional hernia, and CSF rhinorrhea in standard large craniectomy group were lower than those in routine craniectomy. Standard large craniectomy could be applied in the patients with severe contusion and laceration of brain and intracranial hypertension.

Key concepts: Medicine, Decompressive craniectomy, Traumatic brain injury, Surgery, Brain Contusion, Anesthesia, Psychiatry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparison of standard large craniectomy with routine craniectomy in treatment of severe traumatic brain injuries — Research Paper | ScholarLens