History, Social Science and Historical Evidence: A Narrative of Eric Hobsbawm's Thought in Historiographical Methodology
Liang Min-su
Abstract
Liang Min-su
Abstract
The thesis makes clear that the contemporary British Marxist historian-Eric Hobsbawm bases historiographical methodology on Marxist scientific methodology, that is namely,historical materialism. Starting from this point, it probes his view on historical research method and its significance to social science so as to reveal his reflections on the following questions from the angle of methodology: the relationship between historiography and social science; the methodological role that historical evidence and historiographical research method play in social science; the relationship between historiography and social science vs. historical evidence.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The thesis makes clear that the contemporary British Marxist historian-Eric Hobsbawm bases historiographical methodology on Marxist scientific methodology, that is namely,historical materialism. Starting from this point, it probes his view on historical research method and its significance to social science so as to reveal his reflections on the following questions from the angle of methodology: the relationship between historiography and social science; the methodological role that historical evidence and historiographical research method play in social science; the relationship between historiography and social science vs. historical evidence.
Key concepts: Historiography, Marxist historiography, Marxist philosophy, Historical materialism, Narrative, Social science, Epistemology, Materialism