In vitro antibacterial activity of Cefotaxime/Tazobactam combination
You Xue-f
Abstract
You Xue-f
Abstract
Objective To investigate the in vitro antibacterial activity of Cefotaxime/Tazobactam combination against β-lactamase-producing Cefotaxime-resistant clinical isolates (MIC≥64 μg/ml). Methods The MICs of different Cefotaxime/Tazobactam combinations (CTX/TAZ 1∶1, 2∶1, 4∶1, 8∶1 and 16∶1) were determined by agar dilution method, and were compared to those of Piperacillin/Tazobactam (8∶1) and Cefoperazone/Sulbactam (1∶1). Results In comparison to Cefotaxime alone, Cefotaxime/Tazobactam showed increased antibacterial activity against β-lactamase-producing E. coli, K. pneumoniae, A. calcoaceticus, E. cloacae, E. aerogenes, S. marcescens and C. diversus. The MIC50s of different Cefotaxime/Tazobactam combinations were 2~64 folds lower than those of Cefotaxime. As to β-lactamase-producing MRSA, MRSE and P. aeruginosa, adding of Tazobactam did not exhibit obvious effects on the antibacterial activity of Cefotaxime, and MIC50s of Cefotaxime/Tazobactam were similar to those of Cefotaxime, or two folds lower. The antibacterial activity of Cefotaxime/Tazobactam combination increased with the amount of Tazobactam in the combination. The MIC50s of Cefotaxime/Tazobactam (4∶1) against E. coli, K. pneumonia, A. calcoaceticus, E. cloacae, E. aerogenes, S. marcescens and C. diversus were 4, 4, 64, 32, 8, 4 and 8 μg/ml respectively, which were 4~32 folds lower than those of Cefotaxime. The antibacterial activities of Cefotaxime/Tazobactam (4∶1) against E. coli and K. penumoniae were 4~8 folds higher than those of Piperacillin/Tazobactam or Cefoperazone/Sulbactam. The antibacterial activities of Cefotaxime/Tazobactam (4∶1) against A. calcoaceticus, E. cloacae, E. aerogenes, S. marcescens and C. diversus were slightly higher than those of Piperacillin/Tazobactam (8∶1), lower or similar to those of Cefoperazone/Sulbactam (1∶1). Conclusion Adding of Tazobactam can effectively increase the antibacterial activities of Cefotaxime against the tested isolates except MRSA, MRSE and P. aeruginosa.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To investigate the in vitro antibacterial activity of Cefotaxime/Tazobactam combination against β-lactamase-producing Cefotaxime-resistant clinical isolates (MIC≥64 μg/ml). Methods The MICs of different Cefotaxime/Tazobactam combinations (CTX/TAZ 1∶1, 2∶1, 4∶1, 8∶1 and 16∶1) were determined by agar dilution method, and were compared to those of Piperacillin/Tazobactam (8∶1) and Cefoperazone/Sulbactam (1∶1). Results In comparison to Cefotaxime alone, Cefotaxime/Tazobactam showed increased antibacterial activity against β-lactamase-producing E. coli, K. pneumoniae, A. calcoaceticus, E. cloacae, E. aerogenes, S. marcescens and C. diversus. The MIC50s of different Cefotaxime/Tazobactam combinations were 2~64 folds lower than those of Cefotaxime. As to β-lactamase-producing MRSA, MRSE and P. aeruginosa, adding of Tazobactam did not exhibit obvious effects on the antibacterial activity of Cefotaxime, and MIC50s of Cefotaxime/Tazobactam were similar to those of Cefotaxime, or two folds lower. The antibacterial activity of Cefotaxime/Tazobactam combination increased with the amount of Tazobactam in the combination. The MIC50s of Cefotaxime/Tazobactam (4∶1) against E. coli, K. pneumonia, A. calcoaceticus, E. cloacae, E. aerogenes, S. marcescens and C. diversus were 4, 4, 64, 32, 8, 4 and 8 μg/ml respectively, which were 4~32 folds lower than those of Cefotaxime. The antibacterial activities of Cefotaxime/Tazobactam (4∶1) against E. coli and K. penumoniae were 4~8 folds higher than those of Piperacillin/Tazobactam or Cefoperazone/Sulbactam. The antibacterial activities of Cefotaxime/Tazobactam (4∶1) against A. calcoaceticus, E. cloacae, E. aerogenes, S. marcescens and C. diversus were slightly higher than those of Piperacillin/Tazobactam (8∶1), lower or similar to those of Cefoperazone/Sulbactam (1∶1). Conclusion Adding of Tazobactam can effectively increase the antibacterial activities of Cefotaxime against the tested isolates except MRSA, MRSE and P. aeruginosa.
Key concepts: Cefotaxime, Tazobactam, Sulbactam, Microbiology, Cefoperazone, Piperacillin, Medicine, Biology