2005•Unpublished venueRequires access

Checking the Responsibility of Criminal Substantive Law for Extorting a Confession by Torture

Jie Liu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Checking extorting a confession by torture fundamentally, depend on the policy-making level, legislation, judicial circle and theory circle, until the masses of people establish human rights ideal of again sting cruel torture and protecting human rights is priority to examining the fact of case forever, the purpose , motive are the kindhearted conduct must not be the reason for pleading the inquisition by torture, and we can't make it become the reasonable basis of having inappropriate disparity of legal punishment of relevant crimes and extorting a confession by torture either. So the crime should be redesigned in our country.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Checking extorting a confession by torture fundamentally, depend on the policy-making level, legislation, judicial circle and theory circle, until the masses of people establish human rights ideal of again sting cruel torture and protecting human rights is priority to examining the fact of case forever, the purpose , motive are the kindhearted conduct must not be the reason for pleading the inquisition by torture, and we can't make it become the reasonable basis of having inappropriate disparity of legal punishment of relevant crimes and extorting a confession by torture either. So the crime should be redesigned in our country.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Checking extorting a confession by torture fundamentally, depend on the policy-making level, legislation, judicial circle and theory circle, until the masses of people establish human rights ideal of again sting cruel torture and protecting human rights is priority to examining the fact of case forever, the purpose , motive are the kindhearted conduct must not be the reason for pleading the inquisition by torture, and we can't make it become the reasonable basis of having inappropriate disparity of legal punishment of relevant crimes and extorting a confession by torture either. So the crime should be redesigned in our country.

Key concepts: Torture, Confession (law), Law, Punishment (psychology), Political science, Criminology, Human rights, Criminal responsibility

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Checking the Responsibility of Criminal Substantive Law for Extorting a Confession by Torture — Research Paper | ScholarLens