Checking the Responsibility of Criminal Substantive Law for Extorting a Confession by Torture
Jie Liu
Abstract
Jie Liu
Abstract
Checking extorting a confession by torture fundamentally, depend on the policy-making level, legislation, judicial circle and theory circle, until the masses of people establish human rights ideal of again sting cruel torture and protecting human rights is priority to examining the fact of case forever, the purpose , motive are the kindhearted conduct must not be the reason for pleading the inquisition by torture, and we can't make it become the reasonable basis of having inappropriate disparity of legal punishment of relevant crimes and extorting a confession by torture either. So the crime should be redesigned in our country.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Checking extorting a confession by torture fundamentally, depend on the policy-making level, legislation, judicial circle and theory circle, until the masses of people establish human rights ideal of again sting cruel torture and protecting human rights is priority to examining the fact of case forever, the purpose , motive are the kindhearted conduct must not be the reason for pleading the inquisition by torture, and we can't make it become the reasonable basis of having inappropriate disparity of legal punishment of relevant crimes and extorting a confession by torture either. So the crime should be redesigned in our country.
Key concepts: Torture, Confession (law), Law, Punishment (psychology), Political science, Criminology, Human rights, Criminal responsibility