2009Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall SurgeryRequires access

Evaluation of the abdominal wounds healing under a single-layer suture or layered suture technique to vertical midline incision of colon-rectal operation

Lei Liu

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the effect difference of abdominal wounds healing between a single-layer suture and layered suture to vertical midline incision of colon-rectal operation.Methods Each 65 patients of 1998 to 2000 and 2007 to 2008 were compared retrospectively.The data pool between a single-layer suture group or layered suture group were analyzed,and the wound healing rate and the incidence of complications were compared.Results The operation time of the single-layer suture group were less than the layered suture group significantly(6.31±0.58 min Vs 9.58±0.95 min).The rate of primary healing and the first rate were no difference.The difference of the two groups such as recent complication include fat liquify(3.07 % vs 15.38 %),infection of incisional wound(3.07 % vs 9.24 %)or disruption of wound(1.54 % vs 13.85 %)and long-term complication such as chronicity sinuses(1.54 % vs 7.69 %)were significant(P0.05).No incisional hernia happen in the single-layer suture group,but 2 cases in layered suture group.The differences were no statistically significant(P0.05).Conclusions A single-layer suture is effective significantly to prevent infection of incision or disruption of wound compared with layered suture.To use wide-bite closure was an important technique to prevent acute or delayed wound failure.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the effect difference of abdominal wounds healing between a single-layer suture and layered suture to vertical midline incision of colon-rectal operation.Methods Each 65 patients of 1998 to 2000 and 2007 to 2008 were compared retrospectively.The data pool between a single-layer suture group or layered suture group were analyzed,and the wound healing rate and the incidence of complications were compared.Results The operation time of the single-layer suture group were less than the layered suture group significantly(6.31±0.58 min Vs 9.58±0.95 min).The rate of primary healing and the first rate were no difference.The difference of the two groups such as recent complication include fat liquify(3.07 % vs 15.38 %),infection of incisional wound(3.07 % vs 9.24 %)or disruption of wound(1.54 % vs 13.85 %)and long-term complication such as chronicity sinuses(1.54 % vs 7.69 %)were significant(P0.05).No incisional hernia happen in the single-layer suture group,but 2 cases in layered suture group.The differences were no statistically significant(P0.05).Conclusions A single-layer suture is effective significantly to prevent infection of incision or disruption of wound compared with layered suture.To use wide-bite closure was an important technique to prevent acute or delayed wound failure.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the effect difference of abdominal wounds healing between a single-layer suture and layered suture to vertical midline incision of colon-rectal operation.Methods Each 65 patients of 1998 to 2000 and 2007 to 2008 were compared retrospectively.The data pool between a single-layer suture group or layered suture group were analyzed,and the wound healing rate and the incidence of complications were compared.Results The operation time of the single-layer suture group were less than the layered suture group significantly(6.31±0.58 min Vs 9.58±0.95 min).The rate of primary healing and the first rate were no difference.The difference of the two groups such as recent complication include fat liquify(3.07 % vs 15.38 %),infection of incisional wound(3.07 % vs 9.24 %)or disruption of wound(1.54 % vs 13.85 %)and long-term complication such as chronicity sinuses(1.54 % vs 7.69 %)were significant(P0.05).No incisional hernia happen in the single-layer suture group,but 2 cases in layered suture group.The differences were no statistically significant(P0.05).Conclusions A single-layer suture is effective significantly to prevent infection of incision or disruption of wound compared with layered suture.To use wide-bite closure was an important technique to prevent acute or delayed wound failure.

Key concepts: Medicine, Fibrous joint, Surgery, Incisional hernia, Wound healing, Significant difference, Complication, Hernia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of the abdominal wounds healing under a single-layer suture or layered suture technique to vertical midline incision of colon-rectal operation — Research Paper | ScholarLens