2010Shanxi nongye kexueRequires access

Yield Comparison between Maize Varieties

Zheng Lian

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

With eight maize varieties-Xianyu 335,Dafeng 26,Tieyan 124,Qiangsheng 16 and so on, the effect of varieties to the yield of maize in randomized block experiment was studied. The results showed that the yield of Xianyu 335 was the highest 16 380 kg/hm2 in eight maize varieties, and followed by Dafeng 26 and Tieyan 124, up to 15 570 and 14 310 kg/hm2 respectively.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

With eight maize varieties-Xianyu 335,Dafeng 26,Tieyan 124,Qiangsheng 16 and so on, the effect of varieties to the yield of maize in randomized block experiment was studied. The results showed that the yield of Xianyu 335 was the highest 16 380 kg/hm2 in eight maize varieties, and followed by Dafeng 26 and Tieyan 124, up to 15 570 and 14 310 kg/hm2 respectively.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

With eight maize varieties-Xianyu 335,Dafeng 26,Tieyan 124,Qiangsheng 16 and so on, the effect of varieties to the yield of maize in randomized block experiment was studied. The results showed that the yield of Xianyu 335 was the highest 16 380 kg/hm2 in eight maize varieties, and followed by Dafeng 26 and Tieyan 124, up to 15 570 and 14 310 kg/hm2 respectively.

Key concepts: Yield (engineering), Randomized block design, Zea mays, Agronomy, Biology, Mathematics, Materials science, Metallurgy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Yield Comparison between Maize Varieties — Research Paper | ScholarLens