2015Laboratory Medicine and ClinicRequires access

Application significance of blind tracheal intubation instrument in the nasotracheal intubation anesthesia for oral maxillofacial fractures

Peng Jian-hon

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the application significance of blind tracheal intubation instrument(BTII)in the nasotracheal intubation anesthesia for oral maxillofacial fractures.Methods 90 cases of patients treated with open reduction and internal fixation for maxillofacial fractures after general anaesthesia and American Society of Anethesiology(ASA)Ⅰ-Ⅱ were selected and divided into 3groups.All of the patients were treated with awake nasal intubation operated by professional persons.Group Ⅰ received traditional blind transnasal tracheal intubation,according to the air sound of breath.Group Ⅱ received endotracheal intubation under fiberoptic bronchoscope through nose.GroupⅢreceived endotracheal intubation under BTII.HRs,SBPs and DBPs before intubation(T0),at the intubation(T1)and 5min after intubation(T2)were recorded,and the one-time successful rates of intubation,the failure rates,the spent-time of successful intubation and the complications of 3groups were also recorded.Results(1)The HR,SBP and DBP of 3groups at T1 were significantly higher than those at T0 and T2(P0.05).There was no significant difference of SpO2 at each time point among 3groups(P0.05).(2)The one-time successful rates of intubation of group Ⅰ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ were 50.0%,96.7% and 93.3% respectively,which of group Ⅰ was significantly different from group Ⅱ and Ⅲ(P0.05),and there was no significant difference between group Ⅱ and Ⅲ(P0.05).(3)The failure rates of groupⅠ,ⅡandⅢ were 26.7%,0.0%and 3.3%respectively,which of groupⅠ was significantly different from groupⅡandⅢ(P0.05),and there was no significant difference between groupⅡandⅢ(P0.05).(4)The spent-time of successful intubation of group Ⅰ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ were(94.1±14.0),(64.6±7.8)and(65.3±9.1)s respectively,which of group Ⅰ was significantly different from group Ⅱ and Ⅲ(P0.05),and there was no significant difference between group Ⅱ and Ⅲ(P0.05).(5)The complications occurred in 3groups after intubation.There were 12,2and 4cases with nasopharyngeal hemorrhage and 8,1and 3cases with sore throat respectively in group Ⅰ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ.Conclusion It is safety,simple and reliable to use BTII in the nasotracheal intubation anesthesia for oral maxillofacial fractures,which is worthy to be promoted and applied in clinical.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the application significance of blind tracheal intubation instrument(BTII)in the nasotracheal intubation anesthesia for oral maxillofacial fractures.Methods 90 cases of patients treated with open reduction and internal fixation for maxillofacial fractures after general anaesthesia and American Society of Anethesiology(ASA)Ⅰ-Ⅱ were selected and divided into 3groups.All of the patients were treated with awake nasal intubation operated by professional persons.Group Ⅰ received traditional blind transnasal tracheal intubation,according to the air sound of breath.Group Ⅱ received endotracheal intubation under fiberoptic bronchoscope through nose.GroupⅢreceived endotracheal intubation under BTII.HRs,SBPs and DBPs before intubation(T0),at the intubation(T1)and 5min after intubation(T2)were recorded,and the one-time successful rates of intubation,the failure rates,the spent-time of successful intubation and the complications of 3groups were also recorded.Results(1)The HR,SBP and DBP of 3groups at T1 were significantly higher than those at T0 and T2(P0.05).There was no significant difference of SpO2 at each time point among 3groups(P0.05).(2)The one-time successful rates of intubation of group Ⅰ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ were 50.0%,96.7% and 93.3% respectively,which of group Ⅰ was significantly different from group Ⅱ and Ⅲ(P0.05),and there was no significant difference between group Ⅱ and Ⅲ(P0.05).(3)The failure rates of groupⅠ,ⅡandⅢ were 26.7%,0.0%and 3.3%respectively,which of groupⅠ was significantly different from groupⅡandⅢ(P0.05),and there was no significant difference between groupⅡandⅢ(P0.05).(4)The spent-time of successful intubation of group Ⅰ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ were(94.1±14.0),(64.6±7.8)and(65.3±9.1)s respectively,which of group Ⅰ was significantly different from group Ⅱ and Ⅲ(P0.05),and there was no significant difference between group Ⅱ and Ⅲ(P0.05).(5)The complications occurred in 3groups after intubation.There were 12,2and 4cases with nasopharyngeal hemorrhage and 8,1and 3cases with sore throat respectively in group Ⅰ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ.Conclusion It is safety,simple and reliable to use BTII in the nasotracheal intubation anesthesia for oral maxillofacial fractures,which is worthy to be promoted and applied in clinical.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the application significance of blind tracheal intubation instrument(BTII)in the nasotracheal intubation anesthesia for oral maxillofacial fractures.Methods 90 cases of patients treated with open reduction and internal fixation for maxillofacial fractures after general anaesthesia and American Society of Anethesiology(ASA)Ⅰ-Ⅱ were selected and divided into 3groups.All of the patients were treated with awake nasal intubation operated by professional persons.Group Ⅰ received traditional blind transnasal tracheal intubation,according to the air sound of breath.Group Ⅱ received endotracheal intubation under fiberoptic bronchoscope through nose.GroupⅢreceived endotracheal intubation under BTII.HRs,SBPs and DBPs before intubation(T0),at the intubation(T1)and 5min after intubation(T2)were recorded,and the one-time successful rates of intubation,the failure rates,the spent-time of successful intubation and the complications of 3groups were also recorded.Results(1)The HR,SBP and DBP of 3groups at T1 were significantly higher than those at T0 and T2(P0.05).There was no significant difference of SpO2 at each time point among 3groups(P0.05).(2)The one-time successful rates of intubation of group Ⅰ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ were 50.0%,96.7% and 93.3% respectively,which of group Ⅰ was significantly different from group Ⅱ and Ⅲ(P0.05),and there was no significant difference between group Ⅱ and Ⅲ(P0.05).(3)The failure rates of groupⅠ,ⅡandⅢ were 26.7%,0.0%and 3.3%respectively,which of groupⅠ was significantly different from groupⅡandⅢ(P0.05),and there was no significant difference between groupⅡandⅢ(P0.05).(4)The spent-time of successful intubation of group Ⅰ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ were(94.1±14.0),(64.6±7.8)and(65.3±9.1)s respectively,which of group Ⅰ was significantly different from group Ⅱ and Ⅲ(P0.05),and there was no significant difference between group Ⅱ and Ⅲ(P0.05).(5)The complications occurred in 3groups after intubation.There were 12,2and 4cases with nasopharyngeal hemorrhage and 8,1and 3cases with sore throat respectively in group Ⅰ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ.Conclusion It is safety,simple and reliable to use BTII in the nasotracheal intubation anesthesia for oral maxillofacial fractures,which is worthy to be promoted and applied in clinical.

Key concepts: Medicine, Nasotracheal intubation, Intubation, Anesthesia, Significant difference, Endotracheal intubation, Tracheal intubation, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Application significance of blind tracheal intubation instrument in the nasotracheal intubation anesthesia for oral maxillofacial fractures — Research Paper | ScholarLens