2002Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical RemediesRequires access

Azelastine nasal spray in treating perennial allergic rhinitis: a randomly double-blind trial

Shen Bei-bei

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of azelastine nasal spray in treating perennial allergic rhinitis. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with moderate to severe perennial allergic rhinitis were qualified for the random, double-blind, comparative research. They were divided into two groups: azelastine group (nineteen patients) was treated with azelastine nasal spray, one puff per nostril twice daily for 4 wk (one puff=140 μg azelastine), and levocabastine group (nineteen patients) was treated with levocabastine nasal spray 2 puff per nostril twice daily as the control. At the end of 2 wk and 4 wk treatment, the comprehensine evaluation of effect was made according to the subjective symptom score and objective examination. RESULTS: The total effect rate was 95 %, and 84 %, in azelastine group and in the levocabastine group, respectively (P 0.05). The differences of symptom score (pre-treatment score-post-treatment score) of sneezing, discharge, itching of nose and nasal blockage between the two groups decieased and those were 1.4±0.8 and 1.3±1.0, 1.0±0.7 and 0.8±0.9, 1.3±0.6 and 1.4±0.7, 0.7±0.7 and 0.7±0.8, 0.8±0.8 and 0.5±0.7, respectively (P0.05). No remarkable adverse reaction was observed. CONCLUSION: Azelastine nasal spray has similar therapeutic efficacy and tolerability to levocabastine nasal spray in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM: To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of azelastine nasal spray in treating perennial allergic rhinitis. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with moderate to severe perennial allergic rhinitis were qualified for the random, double-blind, comparative research. They were divided into two groups: azelastine group (nineteen patients) was treated with azelastine nasal spray, one puff per nostril twice daily for 4 wk (one puff=140 μg azelastine), and levocabastine group (nineteen patients) was treated with levocabastine nasal spray 2 puff per nostril twice daily as the control. At the end of 2 wk and 4 wk treatment, the comprehensine evaluation of effect was made according to the subjective symptom score and objective examination. RESULTS: The total effect rate was 95 %, and 84 %, in azelastine group and in the levocabastine group, respectively (P 0.05). The differences of symptom score (pre-treatment score-post-treatment score) of sneezing, discharge, itching of nose and nasal blockage between the two groups decieased and those were 1.4±0.8 and 1.3±1.0, 1.0±0.7 and 0.8±0.9, 1.3±0.6 and 1.4±0.7, 0.7±0.7 and 0.7±0.8, 0.8±0.8 and 0.5±0.7, respectively (P0.05). No remarkable adverse reaction was observed. CONCLUSION: Azelastine nasal spray has similar therapeutic efficacy and tolerability to levocabastine nasal spray in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM: To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of azelastine nasal spray in treating perennial allergic rhinitis. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with moderate to severe perennial allergic rhinitis were qualified for the random, double-blind, comparative research. They were divided into two groups: azelastine group (nineteen patients) was treated with azelastine nasal spray, one puff per nostril twice daily for 4 wk (one puff=140 μg azelastine), and levocabastine group (nineteen patients) was treated with levocabastine nasal spray 2 puff per nostril twice daily as the control. At the end of 2 wk and 4 wk treatment, the comprehensine evaluation of effect was made according to the subjective symptom score and objective examination. RESULTS: The total effect rate was 95 %, and 84 %, in azelastine group and in the levocabastine group, respectively (P 0.05). The differences of symptom score (pre-treatment score-post-treatment score) of sneezing, discharge, itching of nose and nasal blockage between the two groups decieased and those were 1.4±0.8 and 1.3±1.0, 1.0±0.7 and 0.8±0.9, 1.3±0.6 and 1.4±0.7, 0.7±0.7 and 0.7±0.8, 0.8±0.8 and 0.5±0.7, respectively (P0.05). No remarkable adverse reaction was observed. CONCLUSION: Azelastine nasal spray has similar therapeutic efficacy and tolerability to levocabastine nasal spray in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis.

Key concepts: Azelastine, Nostril, Nasal spray, Medicine, Tolerability, Anesthesia, Nose, Adverse effect

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Azelastine nasal spray in treating perennial allergic rhinitis: a randomly double-blind trial — Research Paper | ScholarLens