2006Chinese Journal of Aesthetic and Plastic SurgeryRequires access

Clinical evaluation of restoring residual root and crown with crown lengthening surgery

Sun Xiao-j

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of the crown lengthening surgery on the restoration of residual root and crown with subgingivally involved defect. Methods From May 2004 to June 2005, according to the subgingival depth of the defect. 36 teeth from 32 patients with subgingivally involved defect were diveded into two groups: group A(20 teeth, depth3.0mm), group B (16 teeth, 3.0mm ≤depth≤4.0mm). All teeth were treated by the crown lengthening first and then underwent post-crown prosthesis at 6 weeks postoperatively. After fowllowing up for 6 months the preoperative and postoperative date were reviewed and analyzed. Results The teeth sections of two groups were exposed well and the color of the gingival margin of two group looked normal. The overall effective rate was 100% and satiafying rate was 77.78%. The restoration of group A without any teeth loose was better than that of group B with 50.00% teeth loose at degree Ⅰ. Postoperative PD, PLI and SBI were better than those preoperatively (P0.05). There were no differences on the periodontal index among the two groups (P0.05). Conclusion Crown lenthening surgery is a good method for the protection and restoration of residual root and crown, but should be limited to the right patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of the crown lengthening surgery on the restoration of residual root and crown with subgingivally involved defect. Methods From May 2004 to June 2005, according to the subgingival depth of the defect. 36 teeth from 32 patients with subgingivally involved defect were diveded into two groups: group A(20 teeth, depth3.0mm), group B (16 teeth, 3.0mm ≤depth≤4.0mm). All teeth were treated by the crown lengthening first and then underwent post-crown prosthesis at 6 weeks postoperatively. After fowllowing up for 6 months the preoperative and postoperative date were reviewed and analyzed. Results The teeth sections of two groups were exposed well and the color of the gingival margin of two group looked normal. The overall effective rate was 100% and satiafying rate was 77.78%. The restoration of group A without any teeth loose was better than that of group B with 50.00% teeth loose at degree Ⅰ. Postoperative PD, PLI and SBI were better than those preoperatively (P0.05). There were no differences on the periodontal index among the two groups (P0.05). Conclusion Crown lenthening surgery is a good method for the protection and restoration of residual root and crown, but should be limited to the right patients.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of the crown lengthening surgery on the restoration of residual root and crown with subgingivally involved defect. Methods From May 2004 to June 2005, according to the subgingival depth of the defect. 36 teeth from 32 patients with subgingivally involved defect were diveded into two groups: group A(20 teeth, depth3.0mm), group B (16 teeth, 3.0mm ≤depth≤4.0mm). All teeth were treated by the crown lengthening first and then underwent post-crown prosthesis at 6 weeks postoperatively. After fowllowing up for 6 months the preoperative and postoperative date were reviewed and analyzed. Results The teeth sections of two groups were exposed well and the color of the gingival margin of two group looked normal. The overall effective rate was 100% and satiafying rate was 77.78%. The restoration of group A without any teeth loose was better than that of group B with 50.00% teeth loose at degree Ⅰ. Postoperative PD, PLI and SBI were better than those preoperatively (P0.05). There were no differences on the periodontal index among the two groups (P0.05). Conclusion Crown lenthening surgery is a good method for the protection and restoration of residual root and crown, but should be limited to the right patients.

Key concepts: Crown (dentistry), Crown lengthening, Dentistry, Medicine, Orthodontics, Periodontal surgery, Anterior teeth

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical evaluation of restoring residual root and crown with crown lengthening surgery — Research Paper | ScholarLens