Impact of ~(18)F-FDG PET/CT compared with diagnostic CT on following-up breast cancer after surgery
Huang Qing-juan
Abstract
Huang Qing-juan
Abstract
Objective:To compare the imaging characteristics of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET / CT with same day diagnostic CT on breast cancer patients after surgery. Method:70 breast cancer patients after surgery were enrolled to take 18F-FDG PET / CT for 81 times. All patients underwent PET / CT for diagnostic purposes followed by diagnostic CT in the region of chest with breath hold. Results:31 PET / CT and 31 diagnostic CT results didn’t show any significant lesion. Another 50 studies displayed 372 lesions. The sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive productive value,and negative productive value of PET / CT were 88.0% ,50.0% ,84.9% , 95.3%,26.8%,and those of diagnostic CT were 60.5%,31.6%,57.5%,88.6%,8.3%. As far as lymph node metastases were concerned,the sensitivity for PET / CT was 100%,but for diagnostic CT was 52.3%. As for bone and soft tissue metastases,the sensitivity for PET / CT was 98.1%,compared with 25.0% of diagnostic CT. As for pulmonary nodal metastasis,the sensitivity for PET / CT was 58.8%,but for diagnostic CT was 98.9%. Conclusion:PET / CT accurately detects more malignant lesions than CT does for lymph node and bone and soft tissue metastases. However,the diagnostic CT with breath hold will have an advantage over PET / CT on pulmonary metastases, especial small pulmonary node.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective:To compare the imaging characteristics of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET / CT with same day diagnostic CT on breast cancer patients after surgery. Method:70 breast cancer patients after surgery were enrolled to take 18F-FDG PET / CT for 81 times. All patients underwent PET / CT for diagnostic purposes followed by diagnostic CT in the region of chest with breath hold. Results:31 PET / CT and 31 diagnostic CT results didn’t show any significant lesion. Another 50 studies displayed 372 lesions. The sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive productive value,and negative productive value of PET / CT were 88.0% ,50.0% ,84.9% , 95.3%,26.8%,and those of diagnostic CT were 60.5%,31.6%,57.5%,88.6%,8.3%. As far as lymph node metastases were concerned,the sensitivity for PET / CT was 100%,but for diagnostic CT was 52.3%. As for bone and soft tissue metastases,the sensitivity for PET / CT was 98.1%,compared with 25.0% of diagnostic CT. As for pulmonary nodal metastasis,the sensitivity for PET / CT was 58.8%,but for diagnostic CT was 98.9%. Conclusion:PET / CT accurately detects more malignant lesions than CT does for lymph node and bone and soft tissue metastases. However,the diagnostic CT with breath hold will have an advantage over PET / CT on pulmonary metastases, especial small pulmonary node.
Key concepts: Medicine, Radiology, Breast cancer, Soft tissue, Lymph node, Nuclear medicine, PET-CT, Diagnostic accuracy