2010•Acta Universitatis Medicinalis NanjingRequires access

Impact of ~(18)F-FDG PET/CT compared with diagnostic CT on following-up breast cancer after surgery

Huang Qing-juan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To compare the imaging characteristics of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET / CT with same day diagnostic CT on breast cancer patients after surgery. Method:70 breast cancer patients after surgery were enrolled to take 18F-FDG PET / CT for 81 times. All patients underwent PET / CT for diagnostic purposes followed by diagnostic CT in the region of chest with breath hold. Results:31 PET / CT and 31 diagnostic CT results didn’t show any significant lesion. Another 50 studies displayed 372 lesions. The sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive productive value,and negative productive value of PET / CT were 88.0% ,50.0% ,84.9% , 95.3%,26.8%,and those of diagnostic CT were 60.5%,31.6%,57.5%,88.6%,8.3%. As far as lymph node metastases were concerned,the sensitivity for PET / CT was 100%,but for diagnostic CT was 52.3%. As for bone and soft tissue metastases,the sensitivity for PET / CT was 98.1%,compared with 25.0% of diagnostic CT. As for pulmonary nodal metastasis,the sensitivity for PET / CT was 58.8%,but for diagnostic CT was 98.9%. Conclusion:PET / CT accurately detects more malignant lesions than CT does for lymph node and bone and soft tissue metastases. However,the diagnostic CT with breath hold will have an advantage over PET / CT on pulmonary metastases, especial small pulmonary node.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To compare the imaging characteristics of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET / CT with same day diagnostic CT on breast cancer patients after surgery. Method:70 breast cancer patients after surgery were enrolled to take 18F-FDG PET / CT for 81 times. All patients underwent PET / CT for diagnostic purposes followed by diagnostic CT in the region of chest with breath hold. Results:31 PET / CT and 31 diagnostic CT results didn’t show any significant lesion. Another 50 studies displayed 372 lesions. The sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive productive value,and negative productive value of PET / CT were 88.0% ,50.0% ,84.9% , 95.3%,26.8%,and those of diagnostic CT were 60.5%,31.6%,57.5%,88.6%,8.3%. As far as lymph node metastases were concerned,the sensitivity for PET / CT was 100%,but for diagnostic CT was 52.3%. As for bone and soft tissue metastases,the sensitivity for PET / CT was 98.1%,compared with 25.0% of diagnostic CT. As for pulmonary nodal metastasis,the sensitivity for PET / CT was 58.8%,but for diagnostic CT was 98.9%. Conclusion:PET / CT accurately detects more malignant lesions than CT does for lymph node and bone and soft tissue metastases. However,the diagnostic CT with breath hold will have an advantage over PET / CT on pulmonary metastases, especial small pulmonary node.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To compare the imaging characteristics of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET / CT with same day diagnostic CT on breast cancer patients after surgery. Method:70 breast cancer patients after surgery were enrolled to take 18F-FDG PET / CT for 81 times. All patients underwent PET / CT for diagnostic purposes followed by diagnostic CT in the region of chest with breath hold. Results:31 PET / CT and 31 diagnostic CT results didn’t show any significant lesion. Another 50 studies displayed 372 lesions. The sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive productive value,and negative productive value of PET / CT were 88.0% ,50.0% ,84.9% , 95.3%,26.8%,and those of diagnostic CT were 60.5%,31.6%,57.5%,88.6%,8.3%. As far as lymph node metastases were concerned,the sensitivity for PET / CT was 100%,but for diagnostic CT was 52.3%. As for bone and soft tissue metastases,the sensitivity for PET / CT was 98.1%,compared with 25.0% of diagnostic CT. As for pulmonary nodal metastasis,the sensitivity for PET / CT was 58.8%,but for diagnostic CT was 98.9%. Conclusion:PET / CT accurately detects more malignant lesions than CT does for lymph node and bone and soft tissue metastases. However,the diagnostic CT with breath hold will have an advantage over PET / CT on pulmonary metastases, especial small pulmonary node.

Key concepts: Medicine, Radiology, Breast cancer, Soft tissue, Lymph node, Nuclear medicine, PET-CT, Diagnostic accuracy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Impact of ~(18)F-FDG PET/CT compared with diagnostic CT on following-up breast cancer after surgery — Research Paper | ScholarLens