2007Guoshu xuebaoRequires access

Comparison of pear pollen tube growth in style and fruit set after self-and cross-pollination in different floral development stage

Shaoling Zhang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In this study, two pear cultivars with different self-incompatible degree, Housui and Kikusui, were self-pollinated and Housui was pollinated with the pollen of Kikusui in their different floral development stage. Pollen germination and tube growth state were observed with fluorescence microscopy. The results were as follows. Pollen germination rate in vivo was high both for self-pollination and cross-pollination at or after anthesis; There were some difference in pollen tube growth speed and the place where pollen tube growth arrested among different pollination type, pollen tube growth being slower and shorter in Housui self-pollination, faster and longer in Kikusui self-pollination, fastest and longest in cross-pollination. For self-pollination, pollen tube length was longer both on the fourth day before and fourth day after anthesis. Pollen tube was very short when they were pollinated sixth day before anthesis. These were consistent with the result of fruit set in field pollination.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this study, two pear cultivars with different self-incompatible degree, Housui and Kikusui, were self-pollinated and Housui was pollinated with the pollen of Kikusui in their different floral development stage. Pollen germination and tube growth state were observed with fluorescence microscopy. The results were as follows. Pollen germination rate in vivo was high both for self-pollination and cross-pollination at or after anthesis; There were some difference in pollen tube growth speed and the place where pollen tube growth arrested among different pollination type, pollen tube growth being slower and shorter in Housui self-pollination, faster and longer in Kikusui self-pollination, fastest and longest in cross-pollination. For self-pollination, pollen tube length was longer both on the fourth day before and fourth day after anthesis. Pollen tube was very short when they were pollinated sixth day before anthesis. These were consistent with the result of fruit set in field pollination.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this study, two pear cultivars with different self-incompatible degree, Housui and Kikusui, were self-pollinated and Housui was pollinated with the pollen of Kikusui in their different floral development stage. Pollen germination and tube growth state were observed with fluorescence microscopy. The results were as follows. Pollen germination rate in vivo was high both for self-pollination and cross-pollination at or after anthesis; There were some difference in pollen tube growth speed and the place where pollen tube growth arrested among different pollination type, pollen tube growth being slower and shorter in Housui self-pollination, faster and longer in Kikusui self-pollination, fastest and longest in cross-pollination. For self-pollination, pollen tube length was longer both on the fourth day before and fourth day after anthesis. Pollen tube was very short when they were pollinated sixth day before anthesis. These were consistent with the result of fruit set in field pollination.

Key concepts: Pollination, Pollen tube, Anthesis, Pollen, Germination, Biology, PEAR, Self-pollination

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of pear pollen tube growth in style and fruit set after self-and cross-pollination in different floral development stage — Research Paper | ScholarLens