2007Beifang faxueRequires access

Study on the Obligation Arising from Antecedent Actions in the Non-typical Omission Offens

Liu Shi-xi

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The antecedent actions which can arouse obligations should cause the actual,particular and impendent danger to the legal interests.Therefore,the antecedent actions enjoy the features of directness,high possibility,and impendence.In principle,the antecedent actions should take the violation of legal rules as the precondition,however,it is possible to cause action obligations if such obligation imposition will not violate a higher value pursued by the criminal law.Therefore,the action obligation should be regulated pursuant to the doctrine of prohibiting repeated criminology.It is concluded that the antecedent actions which can arouse action obligation may bear such features as either actions or omissions,either intentional or negligent,or non-liability actions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The antecedent actions which can arouse obligations should cause the actual,particular and impendent danger to the legal interests.Therefore,the antecedent actions enjoy the features of directness,high possibility,and impendence.In principle,the antecedent actions should take the violation of legal rules as the precondition,however,it is possible to cause action obligations if such obligation imposition will not violate a higher value pursued by the criminal law.Therefore,the action obligation should be regulated pursuant to the doctrine of prohibiting repeated criminology.It is concluded that the antecedent actions which can arouse action obligation may bear such features as either actions or omissions,either intentional or negligent,or non-liability actions.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The antecedent actions which can arouse obligations should cause the actual,particular and impendent danger to the legal interests.Therefore,the antecedent actions enjoy the features of directness,high possibility,and impendence.In principle,the antecedent actions should take the violation of legal rules as the precondition,however,it is possible to cause action obligations if such obligation imposition will not violate a higher value pursued by the criminal law.Therefore,the action obligation should be regulated pursuant to the doctrine of prohibiting repeated criminology.It is concluded that the antecedent actions which can arouse action obligation may bear such features as either actions or omissions,either intentional or negligent,or non-liability actions.

Key concepts: Antecedent (behavioral psychology), Obligation, Action (physics), Doctrine, Liability, Criminal liability, Value (mathematics), Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Study on the Obligation Arising from Antecedent Actions in the Non-typical Omission Offens — Research Paper | ScholarLens