On The Internet Service Providers' Responsibility for Indirect Infringement
Kemei Li
Abstract
Kemei Li
Abstract
In response to the question of whether Internet service providers should be liable for materials to the third party,America and China practice differently.China has integrated negligence liability with fault liability,but America adopted the principle of non-liability.Each of the three approaches achieves the height of his ability,but applying a single one is far from satisfactory.If we can adopt the mixed liability or improve negligence liability on the basis of weighting carefully,then a tough problem in law circle is to be settled.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In response to the question of whether Internet service providers should be liable for materials to the third party,America and China practice differently.China has integrated negligence liability with fault liability,but America adopted the principle of non-liability.Each of the three approaches achieves the height of his ability,but applying a single one is far from satisfactory.If we can adopt the mixed liability or improve negligence liability on the basis of weighting carefully,then a tough problem in law circle is to be settled.
Key concepts: Liability, Internet service provider, Service provider, Business, Strict liability, The Internet, China, Service (business)