2011The Chinese Journal of DermatovenereologyRequires access

The Clinical Application of Anti-nucleosome Antibody in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Xuefeng Wan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To study the clinical application of anti-nucleosome antibody(AnuA) in systemic lupus erythematosus(SLE). Methods A method of enzyme-linked immuno-sorbent assay was used to detect the serum AnuA and anti-dsDNA antibody in 187 patients with systematic lupus erythematosus and 84 other rheumatic diseases' patients. Meanwhile Anti-Sm antibody was tested by immunoblotting. Results The sensitivity and specificity of AnuA in SLE were 72.19% and 97.62%,respectively. The sensitivity of AnuA was significantly higher than that of anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm antibody(P0.05); while the specificity of AnuA had not significant difference with that of anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm antibody (P0.05). The sensitivity in SLE was 95.72% by combining AnuA with anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm antibody. The frequency of the oral ulcer,arthralgia,proteinuria and lower C3/C4 levels were significantly higher in 144 positive AnuA SLE than those in AnuA negative SLE(P0.05). Conclusion AnuA has a higher sensitivity and specificity in SLE and is one of the most valuable markers in the diagnosis of SLE. Combining AnuA with anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm antibody might be improved the diagnosis of SLE efficiently. AnuA may be related with the disease activity of SLE.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To study the clinical application of anti-nucleosome antibody(AnuA) in systemic lupus erythematosus(SLE). Methods A method of enzyme-linked immuno-sorbent assay was used to detect the serum AnuA and anti-dsDNA antibody in 187 patients with systematic lupus erythematosus and 84 other rheumatic diseases' patients. Meanwhile Anti-Sm antibody was tested by immunoblotting. Results The sensitivity and specificity of AnuA in SLE were 72.19% and 97.62%,respectively. The sensitivity of AnuA was significantly higher than that of anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm antibody(P0.05); while the specificity of AnuA had not significant difference with that of anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm antibody (P0.05). The sensitivity in SLE was 95.72% by combining AnuA with anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm antibody. The frequency of the oral ulcer,arthralgia,proteinuria and lower C3/C4 levels were significantly higher in 144 positive AnuA SLE than those in AnuA negative SLE(P0.05). Conclusion AnuA has a higher sensitivity and specificity in SLE and is one of the most valuable markers in the diagnosis of SLE. Combining AnuA with anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm antibody might be improved the diagnosis of SLE efficiently. AnuA may be related with the disease activity of SLE.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To study the clinical application of anti-nucleosome antibody(AnuA) in systemic lupus erythematosus(SLE). Methods A method of enzyme-linked immuno-sorbent assay was used to detect the serum AnuA and anti-dsDNA antibody in 187 patients with systematic lupus erythematosus and 84 other rheumatic diseases' patients. Meanwhile Anti-Sm antibody was tested by immunoblotting. Results The sensitivity and specificity of AnuA in SLE were 72.19% and 97.62%,respectively. The sensitivity of AnuA was significantly higher than that of anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm antibody(P0.05); while the specificity of AnuA had not significant difference with that of anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm antibody (P0.05). The sensitivity in SLE was 95.72% by combining AnuA with anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm antibody. The frequency of the oral ulcer,arthralgia,proteinuria and lower C3/C4 levels were significantly higher in 144 positive AnuA SLE than those in AnuA negative SLE(P0.05). Conclusion AnuA has a higher sensitivity and specificity in SLE and is one of the most valuable markers in the diagnosis of SLE. Combining AnuA with anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm antibody might be improved the diagnosis of SLE efficiently. AnuA may be related with the disease activity of SLE.

Key concepts: Antibody, Medicine, Immunology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Clinical Application of Anti-nucleosome Antibody in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus — Research Paper | ScholarLens