2005Clinical Medical Journal of ChinaRequires access

Analysis of the Characteristic and Risk Factors of Ventilator-associated Pneumo- nia in Critical Patients

Guichang Zhang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To discuss the characteristic and risk factors of ventilator-associated pneumonia in mechanical ventilation patients. Methods: The clinical data of patients with mechanical ventilation in ICU from Jan. 2001 to Jun. 2003 were retrospectivly analyzed. Totaly 63 cases were collected,31 patients of them have VAP. The number of non-VAP patients is 32. Results:①The VAP group has a obviously longer period of mechanical ventilation than the non-VAP group[ 17. 3 ± 15. 3)d vs (6. 1 ±. 8)d P0. 01], In the VAP group,41. 9% patients has a period of mechanical ventilation over 10 days, while 9.4% patients of non VAP group has an over 10 days ventilation period. The difference between their is significant. ②31.8% patients in the VAP group were administrated with nutrition support, which is significantly different from the non VAP group (71. 8%)(P = 0. 004).③Logistic analysis suggests that mechanical ventilation time and nutrition support are two risk factors of VAP (using occurrence of VAP as variable). Conclusion:Compared with the non-VPA group.the VAP group has relativly longer period of mechanical ventilation,and lower proportion of proper nutrition support. These may be the two risks factors of VAP.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To discuss the characteristic and risk factors of ventilator-associated pneumonia in mechanical ventilation patients. Methods: The clinical data of patients with mechanical ventilation in ICU from Jan. 2001 to Jun. 2003 were retrospectivly analyzed. Totaly 63 cases were collected,31 patients of them have VAP. The number of non-VAP patients is 32. Results:①The VAP group has a obviously longer period of mechanical ventilation than the non-VAP group[ 17. 3 ± 15. 3)d vs (6. 1 ±. 8)d P0. 01], In the VAP group,41. 9% patients has a period of mechanical ventilation over 10 days, while 9.4% patients of non VAP group has an over 10 days ventilation period. The difference between their is significant. ②31.8% patients in the VAP group were administrated with nutrition support, which is significantly different from the non VAP group (71. 8%)(P = 0. 004).③Logistic analysis suggests that mechanical ventilation time and nutrition support are two risk factors of VAP (using occurrence of VAP as variable). Conclusion:Compared with the non-VPA group.the VAP group has relativly longer period of mechanical ventilation,and lower proportion of proper nutrition support. These may be the two risks factors of VAP.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To discuss the characteristic and risk factors of ventilator-associated pneumonia in mechanical ventilation patients. Methods: The clinical data of patients with mechanical ventilation in ICU from Jan. 2001 to Jun. 2003 were retrospectivly analyzed. Totaly 63 cases were collected,31 patients of them have VAP. The number of non-VAP patients is 32. Results:①The VAP group has a obviously longer period of mechanical ventilation than the non-VAP group[ 17. 3 ± 15. 3)d vs (6. 1 ±. 8)d P0. 01], In the VAP group,41. 9% patients has a period of mechanical ventilation over 10 days, while 9.4% patients of non VAP group has an over 10 days ventilation period. The difference between their is significant. ②31.8% patients in the VAP group were administrated with nutrition support, which is significantly different from the non VAP group (71. 8%)(P = 0. 004).③Logistic analysis suggests that mechanical ventilation time and nutrition support are two risk factors of VAP (using occurrence of VAP as variable). Conclusion:Compared with the non-VPA group.the VAP group has relativly longer period of mechanical ventilation,and lower proportion of proper nutrition support. These may be the two risks factors of VAP.

Key concepts: Ventilator-associated pneumonia, Mechanical ventilation, Medicine, Pneumonia, Ventilation (architecture), Logistic regression, Internal medicine, Mechanical engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Analysis of the Characteristic and Risk Factors of Ventilator-associated Pneumo- nia in Critical Patients — Research Paper | ScholarLens