2014•Bulletin of Disease Control and PreventionRequires access

Diversity characteristics of small mammals communities at different habitats in Shangrila County, Yunnan

Liu Zheng-xian

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To study community structure and diversity of small mammal communities in Shangrila County. Methods A series of ecological methods were involved in this paper to calculate community structure, diversity and similari-ty. Results From June to July, 2011, a total of 425 individuals were captured, including 21 species of 14 genera, 7 families of 4 orders in four different ecological habitats in the area. The results of analysis of diversity of small mammal communities showed that the index was 0.385 7 to 1.953 7 of Shannon-Wiener diversity, 0.556 4 to 0.786 2 of Pielou evenness, 0.180 9 to 0.774 3 of Simpson dominance, and 0.050 1 to 2.393 8 of Margalef richness. Compared with the community similarity index of Whittaker, it was relatively high for the small mammal community in the forest and the farmland habitat, while it was completely different for the small mammal community in residents and alpine shrub meadow. Conclusions Species composition and diversity of small mammal community are different due to the habitat differences. Diversity of the small mammal species is the highest in the forest habitat, then in alpine shrub and meadow, it is low in farmland and residential area in Shangrila County.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To study community structure and diversity of small mammal communities in Shangrila County. Methods A series of ecological methods were involved in this paper to calculate community structure, diversity and similari-ty. Results From June to July, 2011, a total of 425 individuals were captured, including 21 species of 14 genera, 7 families of 4 orders in four different ecological habitats in the area. The results of analysis of diversity of small mammal communities showed that the index was 0.385 7 to 1.953 7 of Shannon-Wiener diversity, 0.556 4 to 0.786 2 of Pielou evenness, 0.180 9 to 0.774 3 of Simpson dominance, and 0.050 1 to 2.393 8 of Margalef richness. Compared with the community similarity index of Whittaker, it was relatively high for the small mammal community in the forest and the farmland habitat, while it was completely different for the small mammal community in residents and alpine shrub meadow. Conclusions Species composition and diversity of small mammal community are different due to the habitat differences. Diversity of the small mammal species is the highest in the forest habitat, then in alpine shrub and meadow, it is low in farmland and residential area in Shangrila County.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To study community structure and diversity of small mammal communities in Shangrila County. Methods A series of ecological methods were involved in this paper to calculate community structure, diversity and similari-ty. Results From June to July, 2011, a total of 425 individuals were captured, including 21 species of 14 genera, 7 families of 4 orders in four different ecological habitats in the area. The results of analysis of diversity of small mammal communities showed that the index was 0.385 7 to 1.953 7 of Shannon-Wiener diversity, 0.556 4 to 0.786 2 of Pielou evenness, 0.180 9 to 0.774 3 of Simpson dominance, and 0.050 1 to 2.393 8 of Margalef richness. Compared with the community similarity index of Whittaker, it was relatively high for the small mammal community in the forest and the farmland habitat, while it was completely different for the small mammal community in residents and alpine shrub meadow. Conclusions Species composition and diversity of small mammal community are different due to the habitat differences. Diversity of the small mammal species is the highest in the forest habitat, then in alpine shrub and meadow, it is low in farmland and residential area in Shangrila County.

Key concepts: Species evenness, Dominance (genetics), Ecology, Habitat, Shrub, Species richness, Geography, Diversity index

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Diversity characteristics of small mammals communities at different habitats in Shangrila County, Yunnan — Research Paper | ScholarLens