2005Journal of Jiangsu Clinical MedicineRequires access

COMPARISON OF MODIFIED EARLY WARNING SCORE(MEWS) AND APACHE II SCORE IN EVALUATION SEVERITY AND PREDICTION OUTCOME OF EMERGENCY POTENTIAL SEVERITY DISEASE

SU Shunting

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the applicability and practicability of MEWS and APACHE Ⅱ in evaluating severity and predicting outcome of emergency potential severity disease.Methods Dada of all 501patients in emergency observation ward and rescue room were recorded and scored with MEWS and APACHE Ⅱ score respectively.Main outcome measures were cardiac arrest and CPCR,intensive care unit(ICU) admission,high dependency unit(HDU) admission,outpatient;death,hospital discharge in 30 days.Ratio of patients in deferent score segments for these indexes were compared respectively as well as area under of ROC curve of MEWS and APACHE Ⅱ score in some of these indexes.Results A ScoreMax of 5 or more was associated with an increase risk of death,ICU admission and HDU admission for MEWS.Ratio of severity patients in score of 5 or more was significantly higher than that of score of less to 5(P0.05).The sensitivity was 100% and specificity was 81.5% when 5 of MEWS were used to discriminate the ICU admission of patients;the sensitivity was 84.3% and specificity was 88.3% for HDU admission.A Score Max of 15 or more was associated with an increase risk of death,ICU admission and HDU admission for APACHE Ⅱ score.Ratio of severity patients in score of 15 or more was significantly higher than that of score of less than 15(P0.05).The sensitivity was 89.2% and specificity was 96.3% when 15 of APACHE Ⅱ score were used to discriminate the ICU admission of patients;the sensitivity was 94.3% and specificity was 82.3% for HDU admission at 10 of APACHE Ⅱ score.In discriminating the ICU admission and death risk of patients,MEWS had considerable power compared with APACHE Ⅱ score(P0.05).All of MEWS and APACHE Ⅱ had good discriminating power for ICU admission and death risk of patients.APACHE Ⅱ had better power in discriminating HDU admission compared with MEWS(P0.05).Conclusion All of MEWS and APACHE Ⅱ can be used to evaluate severity of emergency patients and discriminate the emergency potential severity patients.MEWS may be the first one because of speediness,simplicity,less of spending and handiness compared with APACHE Ⅱ.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the applicability and practicability of MEWS and APACHE Ⅱ in evaluating severity and predicting outcome of emergency potential severity disease.Methods Dada of all 501patients in emergency observation ward and rescue room were recorded and scored with MEWS and APACHE Ⅱ score respectively.Main outcome measures were cardiac arrest and CPCR,intensive care unit(ICU) admission,high dependency unit(HDU) admission,outpatient;death,hospital discharge in 30 days.Ratio of patients in deferent score segments for these indexes were compared respectively as well as area under of ROC curve of MEWS and APACHE Ⅱ score in some of these indexes.Results A ScoreMax of 5 or more was associated with an increase risk of death,ICU admission and HDU admission for MEWS.Ratio of severity patients in score of 5 or more was significantly higher than that of score of less to 5(P0.05).The sensitivity was 100% and specificity was 81.5% when 5 of MEWS were used to discriminate the ICU admission of patients;the sensitivity was 84.3% and specificity was 88.3% for HDU admission.A Score Max of 15 or more was associated with an increase risk of death,ICU admission and HDU admission for APACHE Ⅱ score.Ratio of severity patients in score of 15 or more was significantly higher than that of score of less than 15(P0.05).The sensitivity was 89.2% and specificity was 96.3% when 15 of APACHE Ⅱ score were used to discriminate the ICU admission of patients;the sensitivity was 94.3% and specificity was 82.3% for HDU admission at 10 of APACHE Ⅱ score.In discriminating the ICU admission and death risk of patients,MEWS had considerable power compared with APACHE Ⅱ score(P0.05).All of MEWS and APACHE Ⅱ had good discriminating power for ICU admission and death risk of patients.APACHE Ⅱ had better power in discriminating HDU admission compared with MEWS(P0.05).Conclusion All of MEWS and APACHE Ⅱ can be used to evaluate severity of emergency patients and discriminate the emergency potential severity patients.MEWS may be the first one because of speediness,simplicity,less of spending and handiness compared with APACHE Ⅱ.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the applicability and practicability of MEWS and APACHE Ⅱ in evaluating severity and predicting outcome of emergency potential severity disease.Methods Dada of all 501patients in emergency observation ward and rescue room were recorded and scored with MEWS and APACHE Ⅱ score respectively.Main outcome measures were cardiac arrest and CPCR,intensive care unit(ICU) admission,high dependency unit(HDU) admission,outpatient;death,hospital discharge in 30 days.Ratio of patients in deferent score segments for these indexes were compared respectively as well as area under of ROC curve of MEWS and APACHE Ⅱ score in some of these indexes.Results A ScoreMax of 5 or more was associated with an increase risk of death,ICU admission and HDU admission for MEWS.Ratio of severity patients in score of 5 or more was significantly higher than that of score of less to 5(P0.05).The sensitivity was 100% and specificity was 81.5% when 5 of MEWS were used to discriminate the ICU admission of patients;the sensitivity was 84.3% and specificity was 88.3% for HDU admission.A Score Max of 15 or more was associated with an increase risk of death,ICU admission and HDU admission for APACHE Ⅱ score.Ratio of severity patients in score of 15 or more was significantly higher than that of score of less than 15(P0.05).The sensitivity was 89.2% and specificity was 96.3% when 15 of APACHE Ⅱ score were used to discriminate the ICU admission of patients;the sensitivity was 94.3% and specificity was 82.3% for HDU admission at 10 of APACHE Ⅱ score.In discriminating the ICU admission and death risk of patients,MEWS had considerable power compared with APACHE Ⅱ score(P0.05).All of MEWS and APACHE Ⅱ had good discriminating power for ICU admission and death risk of patients.APACHE Ⅱ had better power in discriminating HDU admission compared with MEWS(P0.05).Conclusion All of MEWS and APACHE Ⅱ can be used to evaluate severity of emergency patients and discriminate the emergency potential severity patients.MEWS may be the first one because of speediness,simplicity,less of spending and handiness compared with APACHE Ⅱ.

Key concepts: Mews, Early warning score, Medicine, Intensive care unit, APACHE II, Severity of illness, Internal medicine, Receiver operating characteristic

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
COMPARISON OF MODIFIED EARLY WARNING SCORE(MEWS) AND APACHE II SCORE IN EVALUATION SEVERITY AND PREDICTION OUTCOME OF EMERGENCY POTENTIAL SEVERITY DISEASE — Research Paper | ScholarLens