ScholarLens Back to search
1995•Unpublished venueRequires access

Terbutaline vs aminophylline in treating pediatric asthmatic diseases

Guo Wen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

AIM:To compare the short-term curative effects of terbutaline vs aminophylline in treatment of pediatric asthmatic diseases. METHODS: Terbutaline group (M 24, F 26; age 4±s 3 a, asthmatic bronchitis 23 cases, infant asthma 14 cases and children bronchial asthma 13 cases) received terbutaline 0. 05 mg/kg, po, tid, for 7 d. Aminophylline group(M 18, F32; age 5±3 a, asthmatic bronchitis 21 cases, infant asthma 16 cases and children bronchial asthma 13 cases) received aminophylline 3-5 mg / kg, po, tid, for 7 d. Penicillin of customary dose was used for preventing infections in 2 groups. RESULTS: The total response rates were 92% in terbutaline group and 60% in amillophylline group(P0.05), No serious adverse reaction was observed. CONCLUSION: The curative effect of terbutaline was better than that of aminophylline in treatment of pediatric asthmatic diseases.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM:To compare the short-term curative effects of terbutaline vs aminophylline in treatment of pediatric asthmatic diseases. METHODS: Terbutaline group (M 24, F 26; age 4±s 3 a, asthmatic bronchitis 23 cases, infant asthma 14 cases and children bronchial asthma 13 cases) received terbutaline 0. 05 mg/kg, po, tid, for 7 d. Aminophylline group(M 18, F32; age 5±3 a, asthmatic bronchitis 21 cases, infant asthma 16 cases and children bronchial asthma 13 cases) received aminophylline 3-5 mg / kg, po, tid, for 7 d. Penicillin of customary dose was used for preventing infections in 2 groups. RESULTS: The total response rates were 92% in terbutaline group and 60% in amillophylline group(P0.05), No serious adverse reaction was observed. CONCLUSION: The curative effect of terbutaline was better than that of aminophylline in treatment of pediatric asthmatic diseases.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM:To compare the short-term curative effects of terbutaline vs aminophylline in treatment of pediatric asthmatic diseases. METHODS: Terbutaline group (M 24, F 26; age 4±s 3 a, asthmatic bronchitis 23 cases, infant asthma 14 cases and children bronchial asthma 13 cases) received terbutaline 0. 05 mg/kg, po, tid, for 7 d. Aminophylline group(M 18, F32; age 5±3 a, asthmatic bronchitis 21 cases, infant asthma 16 cases and children bronchial asthma 13 cases) received aminophylline 3-5 mg / kg, po, tid, for 7 d. Penicillin of customary dose was used for preventing infections in 2 groups. RESULTS: The total response rates were 92% in terbutaline group and 60% in amillophylline group(P0.05), No serious adverse reaction was observed. CONCLUSION: The curative effect of terbutaline was better than that of aminophylline in treatment of pediatric asthmatic diseases.

Key concepts: Aminophylline, Terbutaline, Medicine, Asthma, Bronchitis, Anesthesia, Bronchodilator, Adverse effect

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Terbutaline vs aminophylline in treating pediatric asthmatic diseases — Research Paper | ScholarLens