2000The Practical Journal of CancerRequires access

Magnetic Resonance Image for Diagnosis of Breast Lesions

Zhang Wen-ji

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the application value of MRI in diagnosis of breast lesion.Methods 63 female patients with suspected breast lesion underwent X-ray mammography,breast infrared diaphany,plain and contrast-enhanced MRI examination,and then all of them received surgery treatment and pathologic examination.Results Among 63 cases,two cases of non-breastdisease,which were misdiagnosed by the three tranditional methods,were identified by MRI.Contrast-enhanced MRI had the sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy being respectively 91.4%,96.2%,92.0% in terms of benign and malign lectiferous glands tumor,and Plain MRI presented an accuracy of 79.3% in terms of breast disease.X-ray mammography,ultrasound and breast infrared diaphany had an accuracy of 66.7%,67.8% and 56.3% respectively.Conclusion As far as diagnosis of breast lesions is concerned,contrast-enhanced MRI is superior to other methods and plain MRI presents no significant difference compared with X-ray and ultrasound,but it is better than infrared diaphany.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the application value of MRI in diagnosis of breast lesion.Methods 63 female patients with suspected breast lesion underwent X-ray mammography,breast infrared diaphany,plain and contrast-enhanced MRI examination,and then all of them received surgery treatment and pathologic examination.Results Among 63 cases,two cases of non-breastdisease,which were misdiagnosed by the three tranditional methods,were identified by MRI.Contrast-enhanced MRI had the sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy being respectively 91.4%,96.2%,92.0% in terms of benign and malign lectiferous glands tumor,and Plain MRI presented an accuracy of 79.3% in terms of breast disease.X-ray mammography,ultrasound and breast infrared diaphany had an accuracy of 66.7%,67.8% and 56.3% respectively.Conclusion As far as diagnosis of breast lesions is concerned,contrast-enhanced MRI is superior to other methods and plain MRI presents no significant difference compared with X-ray and ultrasound,but it is better than infrared diaphany.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the application value of MRI in diagnosis of breast lesion.Methods 63 female patients with suspected breast lesion underwent X-ray mammography,breast infrared diaphany,plain and contrast-enhanced MRI examination,and then all of them received surgery treatment and pathologic examination.Results Among 63 cases,two cases of non-breastdisease,which were misdiagnosed by the three tranditional methods,were identified by MRI.Contrast-enhanced MRI had the sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy being respectively 91.4%,96.2%,92.0% in terms of benign and malign lectiferous glands tumor,and Plain MRI presented an accuracy of 79.3% in terms of breast disease.X-ray mammography,ultrasound and breast infrared diaphany had an accuracy of 66.7%,67.8% and 56.3% respectively.Conclusion As far as diagnosis of breast lesions is concerned,contrast-enhanced MRI is superior to other methods and plain MRI presents no significant difference compared with X-ray and ultrasound,but it is better than infrared diaphany.

Key concepts: Medicine, Mammography, Radiology, Magnetic resonance imaging, Ultrasound, Lesion, Breast ultrasound, Breast MRI

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Magnetic Resonance Image for Diagnosis of Breast Lesions — Research Paper | ScholarLens