2004•Unpublished venueRequires access

A Tentative Study on Contract to Be Performed to a Third Party

Han Shi-yua

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Article 64 of Contract law of the PRC 1999 does not deny the third party beneficiary's right to performance, and it may include the right within its plain meaning. By the methods of semantic interpretation, systematic interpretation, interpretation in accordance with the intention of legislator and the interpretation of comparative law, the beneficiary's right to performance may and should be affirmed in the Contract Law. A third party may require performance of a contractual obligation when its right to do so has been expressly agreed upon between the promisor and the promisee. A notice from the third party to accept the right makes the right affirmed. If the third party renounces the right to performance, the right is treated as never having accrued to it. If there is a non-performance in the side of the promisor, both the promisee and the third party may seek remedies for it, and there may be some differences in the contents of the remedies of them.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Article 64 of Contract law of the PRC 1999 does not deny the third party beneficiary's right to performance, and it may include the right within its plain meaning. By the methods of semantic interpretation, systematic interpretation, interpretation in accordance with the intention of legislator and the interpretation of comparative law, the beneficiary's right to performance may and should be affirmed in the Contract Law. A third party may require performance of a contractual obligation when its right to do so has been expressly agreed upon between the promisor and the promisee. A notice from the third party to accept the right makes the right affirmed. If the third party renounces the right to performance, the right is treated as never having accrued to it. If there is a non-performance in the side of the promisor, both the promisee and the third party may seek remedies for it, and there may be some differences in the contents of the remedies of them.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Article 64 of Contract law of the PRC 1999 does not deny the third party beneficiary's right to performance, and it may include the right within its plain meaning. By the methods of semantic interpretation, systematic interpretation, interpretation in accordance with the intention of legislator and the interpretation of comparative law, the beneficiary's right to performance may and should be affirmed in the Contract Law. A third party may require performance of a contractual obligation when its right to do so has been expressly agreed upon between the promisor and the promisee. A notice from the third party to accept the right makes the right affirmed. If the third party renounces the right to performance, the right is treated as never having accrued to it. If there is a non-performance in the side of the promisor, both the promisee and the third party may seek remedies for it, and there may be some differences in the contents of the remedies of them.

Key concepts: Interpretation (philosophy), Obligation, Beneficiary, Notice, Meaning (existential), Law, Legislator, Third party

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Tentative Study on Contract to Be Performed to a Third Party — Research Paper | ScholarLens