2001Journal of Nalnjing UniversityRequires access

Comments on“Pure Jurisprudence” and Its Inspiration to Legal Order in Present-day China

Mingxin Zhang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

“Pure Jurisprudence”, advocated by Kelson, is the major school in Western analytical Positivist jurisprudence. Its most fundamental feature is give ultimate priority to the research methodology of analytical positivism, excluding all subjective elements in legal science, emphasizing that efficiency is the main characteristics of legal norms and that written laws and regulations must be obeyed. Ever since the late Qing Dynasty, legal modernization in China has been influenced immensely by analytical positivist jurisprudence. However, there have been serious changes in legal positivism in contemporary legal research since the late 1970s. In the process of constructing the legal order in contemporary China, the methodology of analytical positivism in its original sense, represented by “Pure Jurisprudence”, and legal efficiency, are very instructive.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

“Pure Jurisprudence”, advocated by Kelson, is the major school in Western analytical Positivist jurisprudence. Its most fundamental feature is give ultimate priority to the research methodology of analytical positivism, excluding all subjective elements in legal science, emphasizing that efficiency is the main characteristics of legal norms and that written laws and regulations must be obeyed. Ever since the late Qing Dynasty, legal modernization in China has been influenced immensely by analytical positivist jurisprudence. However, there have been serious changes in legal positivism in contemporary legal research since the late 1970s. In the process of constructing the legal order in contemporary China, the methodology of analytical positivism in its original sense, represented by “Pure Jurisprudence”, and legal efficiency, are very instructive.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

“Pure Jurisprudence”, advocated by Kelson, is the major school in Western analytical Positivist jurisprudence. Its most fundamental feature is give ultimate priority to the research methodology of analytical positivism, excluding all subjective elements in legal science, emphasizing that efficiency is the main characteristics of legal norms and that written laws and regulations must be obeyed. Ever since the late Qing Dynasty, legal modernization in China has been influenced immensely by analytical positivist jurisprudence. However, there have been serious changes in legal positivism in contemporary legal research since the late 1970s. In the process of constructing the legal order in contemporary China, the methodology of analytical positivism in its original sense, represented by “Pure Jurisprudence”, and legal efficiency, are very instructive.

Key concepts: Jurisprudence, Legal positivism, Positivism, Legal formalism, Modernization theory, Law, China, Order (exchange)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comments on“Pure Jurisprudence” and Its Inspiration to Legal Order in Present-day China — Research Paper | ScholarLens