2011•Unpublished venueRequires access

The Controversy over Speech Perception Theory: Evidence from Neural Mechanisms

Wenli Liu, Zhou Yi-Qi, Yue Guo-an

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

A major theoretical controversy in the field of speech perception is the opposition between the auditory theory and the motor theory,the focus of controversy is the role of motor representations in speech perception.The findings concerning neural mechanisms of speech perception,which are helpful for the settlement of theoretical controversy,were reviewed.The review found that the most significant and consistent activation loci lied in the posterior auditory cortex when human(even animals) perceived speech sounds,which consisted of the dorsal(Heschl's gyrus and planum temporale) and lateral(superior temporal gyrus and superior temporal sulcus) superior temporal cortex.The motor cortex in anterior frontal lobe didn't exhibit a consistent activation pattern,and the effects of motor representations on speech perception mainly derived from a top-down feedback mechanism in some special conditions,which seemed to be not necessary for normal speech perception.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A major theoretical controversy in the field of speech perception is the opposition between the auditory theory and the motor theory,the focus of controversy is the role of motor representations in speech perception.The findings concerning neural mechanisms of speech perception,which are helpful for the settlement of theoretical controversy,were reviewed.The review found that the most significant and consistent activation loci lied in the posterior auditory cortex when human(even animals) perceived speech sounds,which consisted of the dorsal(Heschl's gyrus and planum temporale) and lateral(superior temporal gyrus and superior temporal sulcus) superior temporal cortex.The motor cortex in anterior frontal lobe didn't exhibit a consistent activation pattern,and the effects of motor representations on speech perception mainly derived from a top-down feedback mechanism in some special conditions,which seemed to be not necessary for normal speech perception.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A major theoretical controversy in the field of speech perception is the opposition between the auditory theory and the motor theory,the focus of controversy is the role of motor representations in speech perception.The findings concerning neural mechanisms of speech perception,which are helpful for the settlement of theoretical controversy,were reviewed.The review found that the most significant and consistent activation loci lied in the posterior auditory cortex when human(even animals) perceived speech sounds,which consisted of the dorsal(Heschl's gyrus and planum temporale) and lateral(superior temporal gyrus and superior temporal sulcus) superior temporal cortex.The motor cortex in anterior frontal lobe didn't exhibit a consistent activation pattern,and the effects of motor representations on speech perception mainly derived from a top-down feedback mechanism in some special conditions,which seemed to be not necessary for normal speech perception.

Key concepts: Planum temporale, Neurocomputational speech processing, Superior temporal sulcus, Motor theory of speech perception, Psychology, Perception, Auditory cortex, Speech perception

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Controversy over Speech Perception Theory: Evidence from Neural Mechanisms — Research Paper | ScholarLens