2014Shipin yu fajiao gongyeRequires access

Quality comparison of mulberry powder by hot air drying and vacuum freeze drying

Le Ye

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The quality of two kinds mulberry powders produced by hot air drying and vacuum freeze drying were compared. The results illuminated that both yield and moisture content by vacuum freeze drying were lower than hot air drying,but vacuum drying showed a better solubility. The images taken by the scanning electronic microscope showed the particles of vacuum freeze drying powder were more porous and larger in comparison with the hot air drying. The retention ratio of Vc,total phenol,and anthocyanin of vacuum freeze drying powder was 97. 97%, 98. 40%,96. 36% respectively,while hot air drying powder was much lower at 37. 47%,92. 07%,69. 13%,respectively. Therefore,vacuum freeze drying is better in maintaining the quality of mulberry powder.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The quality of two kinds mulberry powders produced by hot air drying and vacuum freeze drying were compared. The results illuminated that both yield and moisture content by vacuum freeze drying were lower than hot air drying,but vacuum drying showed a better solubility. The images taken by the scanning electronic microscope showed the particles of vacuum freeze drying powder were more porous and larger in comparison with the hot air drying. The retention ratio of Vc,total phenol,and anthocyanin of vacuum freeze drying powder was 97. 97%, 98. 40%,96. 36% respectively,while hot air drying powder was much lower at 37. 47%,92. 07%,69. 13%,respectively. Therefore,vacuum freeze drying is better in maintaining the quality of mulberry powder.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The quality of two kinds mulberry powders produced by hot air drying and vacuum freeze drying were compared. The results illuminated that both yield and moisture content by vacuum freeze drying were lower than hot air drying,but vacuum drying showed a better solubility. The images taken by the scanning electronic microscope showed the particles of vacuum freeze drying powder were more porous and larger in comparison with the hot air drying. The retention ratio of Vc,total phenol,and anthocyanin of vacuum freeze drying powder was 97. 97%, 98. 40%,96. 36% respectively,while hot air drying powder was much lower at 37. 47%,92. 07%,69. 13%,respectively. Therefore,vacuum freeze drying is better in maintaining the quality of mulberry powder.

Key concepts: Freeze-drying, Vacuum drying, Materials science, Spray drying, Water content, Porosity, Moisture, Phenol

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Quality comparison of mulberry powder by hot air drying and vacuum freeze drying — Research Paper | ScholarLens