Ways of and Approaches to Judicial Enforcement of Constitution in Present China
Shangguan Pi-liang
Abstract
Shangguan Pi-liang
Abstract
While applying a law,courts must interpret it and its interpretation is required constitutional.As such,constitutional interpretation is deemed the best way for us to enforce the Constitution judicially within the existing regime.While hearing cases,whether civil or criminal,or cases brought against an administrative agency,China's people's courts in different levels are required to make constitutional interpretation of laws.The fact that each judge is empowered to construe laws as well as the Constitution does not deny the supremacy of the judicial interpretation of the Highest People's Court or the final say of the Standing Committee of the Peoples' Congress of China in terms of construction of laws and the Constitution.By way of constitutional interpretation,courts indirectly apply the Constitution rather than directly invoke it as an authority.However,it is necessary to adduce the quotations from the Constitution in judge's opinions.Where courts find the provisions in a law unconstitutional,they should suspend the trial and report the case to their superiors.And finally it is up to the Highest People's Court to report to the People's Congress to have the problem solved.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
While applying a law,courts must interpret it and its interpretation is required constitutional.As such,constitutional interpretation is deemed the best way for us to enforce the Constitution judicially within the existing regime.While hearing cases,whether civil or criminal,or cases brought against an administrative agency,China's people's courts in different levels are required to make constitutional interpretation of laws.The fact that each judge is empowered to construe laws as well as the Constitution does not deny the supremacy of the judicial interpretation of the Highest People's Court or the final say of the Standing Committee of the Peoples' Congress of China in terms of construction of laws and the Constitution.By way of constitutional interpretation,courts indirectly apply the Constitution rather than directly invoke it as an authority.However,it is necessary to adduce the quotations from the Constitution in judge's opinions.Where courts find the provisions in a law unconstitutional,they should suspend the trial and report the case to their superiors.And finally it is up to the Highest People's Court to report to the People's Congress to have the problem solved.
Key concepts: Constitution, Law, Interpretation (philosophy), Political science, Judicial interpretation, China, Judicial review, Constitutional interpretation