2014•Shanxi Yike Daxue xuebaoRequires access

Comparison of clinical effects of two different infusion methods of anesthesia for thoracic surgery

Feng Ru

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the anesthesia effects of intravenous injection versus target controlled infusion( TCI) of remifentanil combined with propofol in patients under going thoracic surgery. Methods Forty patients undergoing thoracic surgery were enrolled in this study,and randomly divided into two groups: intravenous remifentanil combined with propofol group( IR group,n = 20),and TCI of remifentanil combined with propofol group( TR group,n = 20). In IR group,the patients were intramuscularly administrated with midazolam 0. 05 mg /kg and atropine 0. 5 mg /kg before anesthesia,and propofol 2. 5 mg /kg and remifentanil 4 μg /kg were injected intravenously at the beginning of induction. In TR group,anesthesia was induced with propofol 2. 5 mg /kg and TCI of remifentanil 6 ng /ml,but the doses of the other drugs were the same as those in IR group. Mean arterial blood pressure( MAP),heart rate( HR),surplus pulse O2( SpO2) and the bispectral index( BIS) were recorded and compared. Time of spontaneous breathing,eye opening,extubation,OAAS scored 5,intraoperative awareness and postoperative adverse reactions were compared between two groups. Results The circulation in TR group was relatively stable during the operation. Time of spontaneous breathing,eye opening,extubation and OAAS scored 5 in IR group was significantly longer than in TR group( P 0. 05). There was no significant difference in postoperative nausea and vomiting between two groups. Conclusion TCI of remifentanil combined with propofol can supply hemodynamic stability and maintain an effective depth of anesthesia.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the anesthesia effects of intravenous injection versus target controlled infusion( TCI) of remifentanil combined with propofol in patients under going thoracic surgery. Methods Forty patients undergoing thoracic surgery were enrolled in this study,and randomly divided into two groups: intravenous remifentanil combined with propofol group( IR group,n = 20),and TCI of remifentanil combined with propofol group( TR group,n = 20). In IR group,the patients were intramuscularly administrated with midazolam 0. 05 mg /kg and atropine 0. 5 mg /kg before anesthesia,and propofol 2. 5 mg /kg and remifentanil 4 μg /kg were injected intravenously at the beginning of induction. In TR group,anesthesia was induced with propofol 2. 5 mg /kg and TCI of remifentanil 6 ng /ml,but the doses of the other drugs were the same as those in IR group. Mean arterial blood pressure( MAP),heart rate( HR),surplus pulse O2( SpO2) and the bispectral index( BIS) were recorded and compared. Time of spontaneous breathing,eye opening,extubation,OAAS scored 5,intraoperative awareness and postoperative adverse reactions were compared between two groups. Results The circulation in TR group was relatively stable during the operation. Time of spontaneous breathing,eye opening,extubation and OAAS scored 5 in IR group was significantly longer than in TR group( P 0. 05). There was no significant difference in postoperative nausea and vomiting between two groups. Conclusion TCI of remifentanil combined with propofol can supply hemodynamic stability and maintain an effective depth of anesthesia.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the anesthesia effects of intravenous injection versus target controlled infusion( TCI) of remifentanil combined with propofol in patients under going thoracic surgery. Methods Forty patients undergoing thoracic surgery were enrolled in this study,and randomly divided into two groups: intravenous remifentanil combined with propofol group( IR group,n = 20),and TCI of remifentanil combined with propofol group( TR group,n = 20). In IR group,the patients were intramuscularly administrated with midazolam 0. 05 mg /kg and atropine 0. 5 mg /kg before anesthesia,and propofol 2. 5 mg /kg and remifentanil 4 μg /kg were injected intravenously at the beginning of induction. In TR group,anesthesia was induced with propofol 2. 5 mg /kg and TCI of remifentanil 6 ng /ml,but the doses of the other drugs were the same as those in IR group. Mean arterial blood pressure( MAP),heart rate( HR),surplus pulse O2( SpO2) and the bispectral index( BIS) were recorded and compared. Time of spontaneous breathing,eye opening,extubation,OAAS scored 5,intraoperative awareness and postoperative adverse reactions were compared between two groups. Results The circulation in TR group was relatively stable during the operation. Time of spontaneous breathing,eye opening,extubation and OAAS scored 5 in IR group was significantly longer than in TR group( P 0. 05). There was no significant difference in postoperative nausea and vomiting between two groups. Conclusion TCI of remifentanil combined with propofol can supply hemodynamic stability and maintain an effective depth of anesthesia.

Key concepts: Remifentanil, Propofol, Medicine, Anesthesia, Bispectral index, Midazolam, Vomiting, Heart rate

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of clinical effects of two different infusion methods of anesthesia for thoracic surgery — Research Paper | ScholarLens