2010PubMedRequires access

[Canopy interception characteristics of main vegetation types in Liupan Mountains of China].

Lihong Xu, Zhongjie Shi, Yanhui Wang, Wei Xiong, Pengtao Yu

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

Based on field observation and modeling analysis, this paper studied the canopy interception, interception capacity, and some parameters for interception modeling of main forest types in Liupan Mountains of China. For the test main forest types, the ratio of their canopy interception to precipitation ranged from 8.59% to 17.94%, throughfall was more than 80%, and stemflow ranged from 0.23% to 3.10%. The canopy interception capacity was 0.78-1.88 mm, among which, leaf interception capacity was 0.62-1.63 mm, and stem interception capacity was 0.13-0.29 mm. Conifer forest had a higher canopy interception capacity than broad-leaved forest. The modified model considering the change of leaf area index, which was used in this paper, had a higher simulating precision than the interception model used before. The simulation results for Betula albo-sinensis forest, Pinus armandii forest, Prunus shrub, and Quercus liaotungensis-Tilia paucicostata forest were good, but those for Quercus liaotungensis forest, Pinus tabulaeformis forest, and Acer tetramerum and Euonymus sanguineus shrub were bad, which might be related to the differences in canopy structure, leaf area index, and precipitation characteristics.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Based on field observation and modeling analysis, this paper studied the canopy interception, interception capacity, and some parameters for interception modeling of main forest types in Liupan Mountains of China. For the test main forest types, the ratio of their canopy interception to precipitation ranged from 8.59% to 17.94%, throughfall was more than 80%, and stemflow ranged from 0.23% to 3.10%. The canopy interception capacity was 0.78-1.88 mm, among which, leaf interception capacity was 0.62-1.63 mm, and stem interception capacity was 0.13-0.29 mm. Conifer forest had a higher canopy interception capacity than broad-leaved forest. The modified model considering the change of leaf area index, which was used in this paper, had a higher simulating precision than the interception model used before. The simulation results for Betula albo-sinensis forest, Pinus armandii forest, Prunus shrub, and Quercus liaotungensis-Tilia paucicostata forest were good, but those for Quercus liaotungensis forest, Pinus tabulaeformis forest, and Acer tetramerum and Euonymus sanguineus shrub were bad, which might be related to the differences in canopy structure, leaf area index, and precipitation characteristics.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Based on field observation and modeling analysis, this paper studied the canopy interception, interception capacity, and some parameters for interception modeling of main forest types in Liupan Mountains of China. For the test main forest types, the ratio of their canopy interception to precipitation ranged from 8.59% to 17.94%, throughfall was more than 80%, and stemflow ranged from 0.23% to 3.10%. The canopy interception capacity was 0.78-1.88 mm, among which, leaf interception capacity was 0.62-1.63 mm, and stem interception capacity was 0.13-0.29 mm. Conifer forest had a higher canopy interception capacity than broad-leaved forest. The modified model considering the change of leaf area index, which was used in this paper, had a higher simulating precision than the interception model used before. The simulation results for Betula albo-sinensis forest, Pinus armandii forest, Prunus shrub, and Quercus liaotungensis-Tilia paucicostata forest were good, but those for Quercus liaotungensis forest, Pinus tabulaeformis forest, and Acer tetramerum and Euonymus sanguineus shrub were bad, which might be related to the differences in canopy structure, leaf area index, and precipitation characteristics.

Key concepts: Interception, Throughfall, Canopy, Environmental science, Stemflow, Shrub, Leaf area index, Canopy interception

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Canopy interception characteristics of main vegetation types in Liupan Mountains of China]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens