2009•Di-Si Junyi Daxue xuebaoRequires access

Effect of different time of ischemia on the intensity of spinal cord injury in rabbits

Sang-Woong Han

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

AIM:To observe the intensity of spinal cord ischemic injuries induced by different time of ischemia in rabbits and identify a more sensitive model for the evaluation of neuropretective drugs.METHODS:Thirty New Zealand rabbits were divided into 5 groups:animals in the ischemia groups went through spinal cord ischemia for 10 min(I10),20 min(I20),30 min(I30) or 40 min(I40),while animals in the sham group just had their aorta dissected without cross clamped(SHAM).Neurologic function evaluation was done at 4,8,12,24 and 48 h after reperfusion according to the modified Tarlov criteria.The lumbar spinal cords were collected after the evaluation and stained with HE and TUNEL to appraise morphological and apoptotic changes under microscope.RESULTS:① All animals in I40 group showed absolute paraplegia in all time points after reperfusion(Score 0).All animals but one in group I10 showed normal hind limb motor function.And the Tarlov score of animals in group I20 and group I30 were between that of group I10 and group I40.② The HE staining showed that the spinal cord of rabbits in group I40 exhibited severe spinal cord injury with extensive vacuolation of gray matter while the rabbits in group I10 showed slight injury;the intensity of injury in I20 and I30 groups was between I10 and I40 groups.③ The number of TUNEL positive neurons in the spinal cord of group I20 was significantly more than that of group I40 and the SHAM group.There were no differences with that of group I10 and group I30.CONCLUSION:Twenty min of spinal cord ischemia could produce moderate injury that might be the most sensitive and appropriate model for the evaluation of neuroprotective drugs for spinal cord ischemic injury.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM:To observe the intensity of spinal cord ischemic injuries induced by different time of ischemia in rabbits and identify a more sensitive model for the evaluation of neuropretective drugs.METHODS:Thirty New Zealand rabbits were divided into 5 groups:animals in the ischemia groups went through spinal cord ischemia for 10 min(I10),20 min(I20),30 min(I30) or 40 min(I40),while animals in the sham group just had their aorta dissected without cross clamped(SHAM).Neurologic function evaluation was done at 4,8,12,24 and 48 h after reperfusion according to the modified Tarlov criteria.The lumbar spinal cords were collected after the evaluation and stained with HE and TUNEL to appraise morphological and apoptotic changes under microscope.RESULTS:① All animals in I40 group showed absolute paraplegia in all time points after reperfusion(Score 0).All animals but one in group I10 showed normal hind limb motor function.And the Tarlov score of animals in group I20 and group I30 were between that of group I10 and group I40.② The HE staining showed that the spinal cord of rabbits in group I40 exhibited severe spinal cord injury with extensive vacuolation of gray matter while the rabbits in group I10 showed slight injury;the intensity of injury in I20 and I30 groups was between I10 and I40 groups.③ The number of TUNEL positive neurons in the spinal cord of group I20 was significantly more than that of group I40 and the SHAM group.There were no differences with that of group I10 and group I30.CONCLUSION:Twenty min of spinal cord ischemia could produce moderate injury that might be the most sensitive and appropriate model for the evaluation of neuroprotective drugs for spinal cord ischemic injury.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM:To observe the intensity of spinal cord ischemic injuries induced by different time of ischemia in rabbits and identify a more sensitive model for the evaluation of neuropretective drugs.METHODS:Thirty New Zealand rabbits were divided into 5 groups:animals in the ischemia groups went through spinal cord ischemia for 10 min(I10),20 min(I20),30 min(I30) or 40 min(I40),while animals in the sham group just had their aorta dissected without cross clamped(SHAM).Neurologic function evaluation was done at 4,8,12,24 and 48 h after reperfusion according to the modified Tarlov criteria.The lumbar spinal cords were collected after the evaluation and stained with HE and TUNEL to appraise morphological and apoptotic changes under microscope.RESULTS:① All animals in I40 group showed absolute paraplegia in all time points after reperfusion(Score 0).All animals but one in group I10 showed normal hind limb motor function.And the Tarlov score of animals in group I20 and group I30 were between that of group I10 and group I40.② The HE staining showed that the spinal cord of rabbits in group I40 exhibited severe spinal cord injury with extensive vacuolation of gray matter while the rabbits in group I10 showed slight injury;the intensity of injury in I20 and I30 groups was between I10 and I40 groups.③ The number of TUNEL positive neurons in the spinal cord of group I20 was significantly more than that of group I40 and the SHAM group.There were no differences with that of group I10 and group I30.CONCLUSION:Twenty min of spinal cord ischemia could produce moderate injury that might be the most sensitive and appropriate model for the evaluation of neuroprotective drugs for spinal cord ischemic injury.

Key concepts: Spinal cord, Medicine, Paraplegia, Spinal cord injury, Ischemia, Lumbar, Anesthesia, Hindlimb

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of different time of ischemia on the intensity of spinal cord injury in rabbits — Research Paper | ScholarLens