2000•Unpublished venueRequires access

STUDY ON PHARMACOKINETICS AND BIOEQUIVALENT EVALUATION OF FAMOTIDINE DISPERSIBLE TABLET

Hao Zhu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:The pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of two Famotidine preparations—dispersible tablet and reference tablet were studied. METHODS:Famotidine concentrations in 10 volunteers plasma were determined after a single oral dose of two famotidine preparations were given respectively to 10 volunteers in an open randomized cross over test. Famotidine concentrations in plasma were assayed by RP HPLC method. RESULTS: After taking a single oral dose of 40 mg two famotidine preparations,the AUC 0→∞ of famotidine dispersible tablet and tablet were (1075.37±226.07)ng·h·ml -1 and (1113.87±269.87)ng·h·ml -1 ; T max were (2.35±0.24)h and (2.45±0.16)h;C max were (186.13±48.34)ng·ml -1 and (164.74±35.00)ng·ml 1 respectively. CONCLUSION:The result of statistics analysis showed that there were no significant difference of the AUC 0→∞ 、T max and C max of famotidine between the two formations(P0.05) and the two famotidine preparations were bioequivalent

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE:The pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of two Famotidine preparations—dispersible tablet and reference tablet were studied. METHODS:Famotidine concentrations in 10 volunteers plasma were determined after a single oral dose of two famotidine preparations were given respectively to 10 volunteers in an open randomized cross over test. Famotidine concentrations in plasma were assayed by RP HPLC method. RESULTS: After taking a single oral dose of 40 mg two famotidine preparations,the AUC 0→∞ of famotidine dispersible tablet and tablet were (1075.37±226.07)ng·h·ml -1 and (1113.87±269.87)ng·h·ml -1 ; T max were (2.35±0.24)h and (2.45±0.16)h;C max were (186.13±48.34)ng·ml -1 and (164.74±35.00)ng·ml 1 respectively. CONCLUSION:The result of statistics analysis showed that there were no significant difference of the AUC 0→∞ 、T max and C max of famotidine between the two formations(P0.05) and the two famotidine preparations were bioequivalent

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE:The pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of two Famotidine preparations—dispersible tablet and reference tablet were studied. METHODS:Famotidine concentrations in 10 volunteers plasma were determined after a single oral dose of two famotidine preparations were given respectively to 10 volunteers in an open randomized cross over test. Famotidine concentrations in plasma were assayed by RP HPLC method. RESULTS: After taking a single oral dose of 40 mg two famotidine preparations,the AUC 0→∞ of famotidine dispersible tablet and tablet were (1075.37±226.07)ng·h·ml -1 and (1113.87±269.87)ng·h·ml -1 ; T max were (2.35±0.24)h and (2.45±0.16)h;C max were (186.13±48.34)ng·ml -1 and (164.74±35.00)ng·ml 1 respectively. CONCLUSION:The result of statistics analysis showed that there were no significant difference of the AUC 0→∞ 、T max and C max of famotidine between the two formations(P0.05) and the two famotidine preparations were bioequivalent

Key concepts: Famotidine, Bioequivalence, Bioavailability, Pharmacokinetics, Plasma concentration, Chromatography, Chemistry, High-performance liquid chromatography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
STUDY ON PHARMACOKINETICS AND BIOEQUIVALENT EVALUATION OF FAMOTIDINE DISPERSIBLE TABLET — Research Paper | ScholarLens