2015Unpublished venueRequires access

Electronic Payment Service: Key Concepts and Legislative Choice

Zhong Zhi-yon

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Electronic fund transfer normally only means fund transfer between accounts of financial institutions by electronic means while electronic payment broadly refers to payment by any electronic device and the legal connotation is not easy to be determined. Payment service is a suitable concept and China is advised to adopt ‘electronic payment service' in order to make a comparison with Negotiable Instruments Law. The concept should include all necessary services ‘managed', ‘facilitated' and ‘enabled' by providers while payment is executed by a ‘payment order initiated through electronic device directly'. The reason of Chinese failure in the WTO dispute of electronic payment service is monopoly of the market of information transmission in payment card, not improper interpretation of the panel.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Electronic fund transfer normally only means fund transfer between accounts of financial institutions by electronic means while electronic payment broadly refers to payment by any electronic device and the legal connotation is not easy to be determined. Payment service is a suitable concept and China is advised to adopt ‘electronic payment service' in order to make a comparison with Negotiable Instruments Law. The concept should include all necessary services ‘managed', ‘facilitated' and ‘enabled' by providers while payment is executed by a ‘payment order initiated through electronic device directly'. The reason of Chinese failure in the WTO dispute of electronic payment service is monopoly of the market of information transmission in payment card, not improper interpretation of the panel.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Electronic fund transfer normally only means fund transfer between accounts of financial institutions by electronic means while electronic payment broadly refers to payment by any electronic device and the legal connotation is not easy to be determined. Payment service is a suitable concept and China is advised to adopt ‘electronic payment service' in order to make a comparison with Negotiable Instruments Law. The concept should include all necessary services ‘managed', ‘facilitated' and ‘enabled' by providers while payment is executed by a ‘payment order initiated through electronic device directly'. The reason of Chinese failure in the WTO dispute of electronic payment service is monopoly of the market of information transmission in payment card, not improper interpretation of the panel.

Key concepts: Payment service provider, Payment, Business, Payment order, Service (business), Electronic money, Electronic funds transfer, Payment card

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Electronic Payment Service: Key Concepts and Legislative Choice — Research Paper | ScholarLens