2014Pharmaceutical Journal of Chinese People's Liberation ArmyRequires access

Quality Standard for Diphenhydramine and Ephedrine Nasal Drops

Zhang Xiao-da

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To establish a method for quality control of Diphenhydramine and Ephedrine Nasal Drops. Methods The chromatographic conditions included the CN column( 200 mm × 4. 6 mm,5 μm) and acetonitrilewater-triethylamine( 50∶ 50∶ 0. 5)( the pH was adjusted to 6. 5 with glacial acetic acid) as the mobile phase,The flow rate was 1. 0 ml·min- 1and monitored at 258 nm. Results Diphenhydramine hydrochloride and ephedrine hydrochloride were identified by chemical reaction methods and HPLC. They were well separated. The calibration curve of diphenhydramine hydrochloride and ephedrine hydrochloride was linear in the range of 0. 0499- 0. 3996 mg·ml- 1( r =0. 9999,n = 5) and 0. 2000- 1. 6002 mg·ml- 1( r =0.9999,n =5). The average recovery was 100.0% with an RSD of 0. 4%( n = 9) and 99. 68% with an RSD of 0. 4%( n = 9) respectively. Conclusion This method is accurate and reproducible. It can be used as a reliable method for quality control of Diphenhydramine and Ephedrine Nasal Drops.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To establish a method for quality control of Diphenhydramine and Ephedrine Nasal Drops. Methods The chromatographic conditions included the CN column( 200 mm × 4. 6 mm,5 μm) and acetonitrilewater-triethylamine( 50∶ 50∶ 0. 5)( the pH was adjusted to 6. 5 with glacial acetic acid) as the mobile phase,The flow rate was 1. 0 ml·min- 1and monitored at 258 nm. Results Diphenhydramine hydrochloride and ephedrine hydrochloride were identified by chemical reaction methods and HPLC. They were well separated. The calibration curve of diphenhydramine hydrochloride and ephedrine hydrochloride was linear in the range of 0. 0499- 0. 3996 mg·ml- 1( r =0. 9999,n = 5) and 0. 2000- 1. 6002 mg·ml- 1( r =0.9999,n =5). The average recovery was 100.0% with an RSD of 0. 4%( n = 9) and 99. 68% with an RSD of 0. 4%( n = 9) respectively. Conclusion This method is accurate and reproducible. It can be used as a reliable method for quality control of Diphenhydramine and Ephedrine Nasal Drops.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To establish a method for quality control of Diphenhydramine and Ephedrine Nasal Drops. Methods The chromatographic conditions included the CN column( 200 mm × 4. 6 mm,5 μm) and acetonitrilewater-triethylamine( 50∶ 50∶ 0. 5)( the pH was adjusted to 6. 5 with glacial acetic acid) as the mobile phase,The flow rate was 1. 0 ml·min- 1and monitored at 258 nm. Results Diphenhydramine hydrochloride and ephedrine hydrochloride were identified by chemical reaction methods and HPLC. They were well separated. The calibration curve of diphenhydramine hydrochloride and ephedrine hydrochloride was linear in the range of 0. 0499- 0. 3996 mg·ml- 1( r =0. 9999,n = 5) and 0. 2000- 1. 6002 mg·ml- 1( r =0.9999,n =5). The average recovery was 100.0% with an RSD of 0. 4%( n = 9) and 99. 68% with an RSD of 0. 4%( n = 9) respectively. Conclusion This method is accurate and reproducible. It can be used as a reliable method for quality control of Diphenhydramine and Ephedrine Nasal Drops.

Key concepts: Diphenhydramine, Triethylamine, Diphenhydramine hydrochloride, Chromatography, Ephedrine, Chemistry, Anesthesia, High-performance liquid chromatography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Quality Standard for Diphenhydramine and Ephedrine Nasal Drops — Research Paper | ScholarLens