2001•Hebei yiyaoRequires access

The effect of benazepril and felodipine extended release tablet on 24 h ambulatory blood pressure in hypertension patients

Hua Fu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To study the efficacy of benazepril and felodipine in hypertension.Methods Sixty two hypertension patients were randomly divided into two groups.Group A(31 cases):benazepril 10 mg at 8 AM.Group B(31 cases):felodipine 5 mg at 8 AM.Both groups were treated for 4 weeks.24 h ambulatory blood pressure was evaluated before and after drug therapy.Results (1)24 hour mean blood pressure was significantly reduced in both groups,but there was no significant difference.The total effective rate was 83.1% for benazepril group,88.2% for felodipine group,but there was no significant difference between two groups(P0.05).(2)The T/P of reduced SP was (62.3±12.8)% for benazepril group,(65.2±13.1)% for felodipine group;The T/P of reduced DP was (68.6±18.3)% for benazepril group,(77.2±12.6)% for felodipine group,but there was no significant difference between two groups (P0.05).Conclusion Both benazepril and felodipine are effective in treatment of hypertension,and T/P is contented.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To study the efficacy of benazepril and felodipine in hypertension.Methods Sixty two hypertension patients were randomly divided into two groups.Group A(31 cases):benazepril 10 mg at 8 AM.Group B(31 cases):felodipine 5 mg at 8 AM.Both groups were treated for 4 weeks.24 h ambulatory blood pressure was evaluated before and after drug therapy.Results (1)24 hour mean blood pressure was significantly reduced in both groups,but there was no significant difference.The total effective rate was 83.1% for benazepril group,88.2% for felodipine group,but there was no significant difference between two groups(P0.05).(2)The T/P of reduced SP was (62.3±12.8)% for benazepril group,(65.2±13.1)% for felodipine group;The T/P of reduced DP was (68.6±18.3)% for benazepril group,(77.2±12.6)% for felodipine group,but there was no significant difference between two groups (P0.05).Conclusion Both benazepril and felodipine are effective in treatment of hypertension,and T/P is contented.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To study the efficacy of benazepril and felodipine in hypertension.Methods Sixty two hypertension patients were randomly divided into two groups.Group A(31 cases):benazepril 10 mg at 8 AM.Group B(31 cases):felodipine 5 mg at 8 AM.Both groups were treated for 4 weeks.24 h ambulatory blood pressure was evaluated before and after drug therapy.Results (1)24 hour mean blood pressure was significantly reduced in both groups,but there was no significant difference.The total effective rate was 83.1% for benazepril group,88.2% for felodipine group,but there was no significant difference between two groups(P0.05).(2)The T/P of reduced SP was (62.3±12.8)% for benazepril group,(65.2±13.1)% for felodipine group;The T/P of reduced DP was (68.6±18.3)% for benazepril group,(77.2±12.6)% for felodipine group,but there was no significant difference between two groups (P0.05).Conclusion Both benazepril and felodipine are effective in treatment of hypertension,and T/P is contented.

Key concepts: Felodipine, Benazepril, Medicine, Ambulatory, Ambulatory blood pressure, Significant difference, Blood pressure, Essential hypertension

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The effect of benazepril and felodipine extended release tablet on 24 h ambulatory blood pressure in hypertension patients — Research Paper | ScholarLens