2015China Medicine and PharmacyRequires access

Clinical studies due to preterm PPROM relevant factors and pregnancy outcome

Chen Lizhe

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the occurrence of PPROM factors and pregnancy outcome. Methods After the study group and the control group PPROM clinical data were retrospectively analyzed to explore the occurrence of PPROM relevant factors, recording two mode of delivery and maternal and child outcomes, given the statistical analysis results in conclusion. Results Reproductive tract infections, cited abortion, pregnancy-induced hypertension are the main factors PPROM occurs, the proportion was 23.81%, 20.24%, 16.67%(P 0.05); preterm study group premature rupture of membranes underwent cesarean delivery rate of up to 46.43%, significantly higher in patients with premature rupture of membranes at term cesarean rate 29.76%; study group of neonatal morbidity and mortality were higher(P 0.05); there was no significant difference between the two groups of neonatal sex comparative results(P 0.05);Apgar score of the control group was(8.98±0.56) points, the study group's Apgar score was(5.64±0.39) points, the study group was significantly less than the control group(P 0.05). Conclusion Clinicians should accurately grasp PPROM clinical features, diagnosis of suspected cases and given active treatment as soon as possible, effectively guaranteeing the quality of life and the lives of mother and child.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the occurrence of PPROM factors and pregnancy outcome. Methods After the study group and the control group PPROM clinical data were retrospectively analyzed to explore the occurrence of PPROM relevant factors, recording two mode of delivery and maternal and child outcomes, given the statistical analysis results in conclusion. Results Reproductive tract infections, cited abortion, pregnancy-induced hypertension are the main factors PPROM occurs, the proportion was 23.81%, 20.24%, 16.67%(P 0.05); preterm study group premature rupture of membranes underwent cesarean delivery rate of up to 46.43%, significantly higher in patients with premature rupture of membranes at term cesarean rate 29.76%; study group of neonatal morbidity and mortality were higher(P 0.05); there was no significant difference between the two groups of neonatal sex comparative results(P 0.05);Apgar score of the control group was(8.98±0.56) points, the study group's Apgar score was(5.64±0.39) points, the study group was significantly less than the control group(P 0.05). Conclusion Clinicians should accurately grasp PPROM clinical features, diagnosis of suspected cases and given active treatment as soon as possible, effectively guaranteeing the quality of life and the lives of mother and child.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the occurrence of PPROM factors and pregnancy outcome. Methods After the study group and the control group PPROM clinical data were retrospectively analyzed to explore the occurrence of PPROM relevant factors, recording two mode of delivery and maternal and child outcomes, given the statistical analysis results in conclusion. Results Reproductive tract infections, cited abortion, pregnancy-induced hypertension are the main factors PPROM occurs, the proportion was 23.81%, 20.24%, 16.67%(P 0.05); preterm study group premature rupture of membranes underwent cesarean delivery rate of up to 46.43%, significantly higher in patients with premature rupture of membranes at term cesarean rate 29.76%; study group of neonatal morbidity and mortality were higher(P 0.05); there was no significant difference between the two groups of neonatal sex comparative results(P 0.05);Apgar score of the control group was(8.98±0.56) points, the study group's Apgar score was(5.64±0.39) points, the study group was significantly less than the control group(P 0.05). Conclusion Clinicians should accurately grasp PPROM clinical features, diagnosis of suspected cases and given active treatment as soon as possible, effectively guaranteeing the quality of life and the lives of mother and child.

Key concepts: Medicine, Premature rupture of membranes, Obstetrics, Pregnancy, Apgar score, Rupture of membranes, Gynecology, Fetus

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical studies due to preterm PPROM relevant factors and pregnancy outcome — Research Paper | ScholarLens